From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [85.214.250.239]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB2F24C668; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741792882; cv=none; b=eqpEN5IBWDjV4i46We8mT9cyb9M46IBph+acnt0/R2AZf46LN3IxA6rCDvDQ2dhllWLIJWXHvkTU2FZ36kc9SC8iKA2PbcQFAoqJXjB8GnQf4DqFNq6KpItP2wJGSLe+9ZZnJYrN+Jz8rjqXicUJNfKRfgrGnfomU46ZTwAKmHI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741792882; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4sQmwkxed47J1yAVFY1M8IrVAON5A+0JqlWOAYiAt0g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kuhWWdqZgeDhxFlKVXs/fj44LA8EdOSpz3C4jEID2cUxUP5jSZELwdCzD09CzIBOTLHn7a5aOziOLQnkv4dEW4oIeydBZj1RyzTkfo+gVBhYhflfCPlBRQLi/SIagODU4gdZGn1kQHml/bSUWoTc6kPIq4rpf7zdU02+zwSwREE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b=xgUseHpf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b="xgUseHpf" Received: from 8bytes.org (p4ffe03ae.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.254.3.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39B93457EA; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:21:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1741792879; bh=4sQmwkxed47J1yAVFY1M8IrVAON5A+0JqlWOAYiAt0g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xgUseHpfm/duHTEwQRTgX7/pauJE0Oh8fZ2kNPDxNy4/6mY9AGXU20bYatRDGiRFC 2XLH9+jFCs8YySrzCSPu9SQgWGSribYev3e1rQ+pwqqyN1mqPJVu/ga9Vn74BA+J3H UiyzKeGKERMvEZHmat4/khRc4SaEi1wdKZDg2XifJe4ljlAwPT69QcrPko87TXxxkQ IHWTxAmwmKNFxYLYPVgWu/YHImYGBRl75RPl+uE9B9qlgJ1rBoX1F46qGH1sRbTTFZ YBvFflm9hrsYcn3+iyZG/zm5sNDFxrm3QO+dMzCUZ9rBy0T7d0kQHMtsNOzdZtNKZk E8iOdVUM4QuoQ== Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:21:18 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Robin Murphy Cc: Baolu Lu , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Russell King , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich , Stuart Yoder , Laurentiu Tudor , Nipun Gupta , Nikhil Agarwal , Will Deacon , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Charan Teja Kalla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Robin, On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:10:04AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Argh! When I moved the dma_configure call into iommu_init_device() for > v2 I moved the warning with it, but of course that needs to stay where > it was, *after* the point that ops->probe_device has had a chance to > filter out irrelevant devices. Does this make it behave? Okay, thanks for the patch. I am currently building a kernel to test it and will report back. Regards, Joerg