From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF8A1953A9 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741942495; cv=none; b=NmcKT7P7QqDX/YEqc8BCZreI/TGLyD0tTbO7aM1GA+3CRUeDK+j4apwQPgX8C5G0jWLbl6Zn4BVdxpRI5ye+opa/5R1j+kysnz0lYBxa/9upVz7Ut2uGDp5AGrVPQVNAvWrBka1SGw5cQ+vMCQ8L85NywpyIZS5jz45rPf3eblo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741942495; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MBz1bcRKfsFEVJsDtb3kn690F8mE3rVuQqKJeipJAEc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BSIR/nPXsoLj8uyWmMhirMLROL1HZJKEuYBZ6GOqhBzsIchd5PGg91SIOFHPFzxvpl+6GpTgY/EXV0FE/S8gRoRBdHVXL5G6SSmfsqBqjUWwG9sB84nuHCSkXi4X2SZVGHXaIdNqgM2mccUreLNyJjWa/Clen/TFFTWdg8fwhfw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=ksC6KD/V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="ksC6KD/V" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=MBz1 bcRKfsFEVJsDtb3kn690F8mE3rVuQqKJeipJAEc=; b=ksC6KD/VkEHRZFqHmU7/ HiIQ65LBcco5B4+8gxSCukRWK7/d8AumXeVRAWCEhcvB5ewC6zZw3p84kYwYZpvJ e2RL9S28tWWEJ9LMEorOPy2txc4vpOwp1i+bl4tupBr3u6orlou6ScuG9zjTqUwd uNwK6uXl7TmXf5IiD+pI1dz8xs5+1SjOmfp1kKDFb2a+bP7vwgl6503BrZ1zOJhZ U/OqEvqfb3F1kwmgd43f8SIDC/Ro3+PXTECwS+ts82HuFO72Hz54tt/aYZzEV0l7 WTFmSOFxHSUaGjIEF1v0mH382mkGLVIi+h9SRa+g7r3BPa0vkaMd/Dl1M/sEiGqa cQ== Received: (qmail 1937771 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2025 09:54:43 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 14 Mar 2025 09:54:43 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@YZnvlkkwBIUgAwDPXyTHAJp038nK7dx+ Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:54:43 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Miquel Raynal , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: rzn1: add optional second clock Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Miquel Raynal , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20250313102546.27335-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250313102546.27335-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250314-sexy-impartial-raccoon-7e8dca@krzk-bin> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mVr91rY3i28z2UsX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250314-sexy-impartial-raccoon-7e8dca@krzk-bin> --mVr91rY3i28z2UsX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Probably the binding was incomplete and you always had external crystal > connected. I assume you want to keep old DTS, so it is fine for me: The documentation explicitly mentions how to wire clock lines if you are not using the RTC and have no oscillator. But yeah, then the RTC DT node should be disabled. And yes, I want to be backwards compatible. > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Thanks! --mVr91rY3i28z2UsX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmfT7s8ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZ54g/9E/ss/oMZht39U/AUfGSpSbVG23K5eKs5d9YgpRYWT17YIt8GexSIHkzm LZDvDUdzZdhaw/m7C6Nwoxpcx3GkeY3H035uSHrk6thY3T8f4wnK6wh0W53PTBS/ Nn+qmdkFYd7y7vIXDzBzx4xdub1W+KgtHI9lhirwm9YyyuLgbp47vbZlT/PTiInx oV709O0V2ST7J+5g7rtJ6SZNA9fw5AY5OlomQLc0gkt51/9Zj5R2HApEtxyJE0bC DSeHLtriUzmR/cMp3nOPlThZa9CwF2zNbUkj+mWoX+/pMkCMJwZD4ufs0Ec5stN8 uP1czuT5KNMnCKpwv8pRyl/n1w9je4CiVSJLHbw7POYYei0iZfYLSevDXRXVWi2R tRurHrkkItd5/PEY9eYAQsl/aiDGvyZtked7E1pRugW4TFeOxuFoxgxa+IMNEASX GQ03aBdEIHMkIwWlrrbsDZr4SnLwiLETy/Lfxb2YobBBqNqa+P2y9ROvg2mUzNGw nSv+qJmsTCs/TOzJohkbeLK5dRuB/+veVXjassrQx1yqWGPsyL6w01vomgPIFiFj JYeaT6TViE/1j1c6MeOPk5Qy6GL0SQ0HySATyQPAKyruE8K8WbMBmEM9DCSivyeK QApvCtA5KS8FozFNnCSgzG3fg/235CAg59hQN3ClwX8JzagijiA= =yk/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mVr91rY3i28z2UsX--