From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce i2c bus extensions
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:49:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9wO8SIy1CcfO0bZ@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205173918.600037-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]
Hi Herve,
> The related big picture has been already presented in
> - the 'Add support for GE SUNH hot-pluggable connector' series [0]
> - the 'Runtime hotplug on non-discoverable busses with device tree
> overlays' talk at Linux Plumbers Conference 2024 [1].
Any outcome of the Plumbers meetup? Was this "double-link" solution
agreed on or so? I mean the code is the easy part here, but I would like
to have an agreed approach for handling all kinds of non-probable
busses. I really don't want an island solution for I2C. So, the key
question here is what do DT maintainers think?
You sent code without bindings, but I'd think the other way around would
be better for the discussion.
Makes sense?
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 17:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce i2c bus extensions Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: Follow i2c-parent when retrieving an adapter from node Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 10:50 ` Herve Codina
2025-04-03 11:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 12:21 ` Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] i2c: i2c-core-of: Move children registration in a dedicated function Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 10:51 ` Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] i2c: i2c-core-of: Handle i2c bus extensions Herve Codina
2025-02-12 5:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-12 9:45 ` Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-02-19 13:38 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce " Herve Codina
2025-03-20 12:49 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-03-20 16:31 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-20 21:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 9:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-06-12 7:52 ` Ayush Singh
2025-06-13 7:30 ` Herve Codina
2025-07-03 11:26 ` Ayush Singh
2025-07-03 15:19 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9wO8SIy1CcfO0bZ@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox