devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:59:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMApsFKHbj2WPLE8@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721024132.6548-8-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:26AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> 
> Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> through the cluster list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  }
>  
>  static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> +				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	scp = rproc->priv;
>  	scp->rproc = rproc;
>  	scp->dev = dev;
> -	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	scp->data = of_data;
>  	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>  
> @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
>  	struct mtk_scp *scp;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
>  	if (IS_ERR(scp))
>  		return PTR_ERR(scp);
>  
> @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> +	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> +	int core_id = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> +		if (!cpdev) {
> +			ret = -ENODEV;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> +		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> +		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			scp_free(scp);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> +		core_id++;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));

(sigh)

Why is list_first_entry() used here rather than just @scp?  What is the purpose
of using the list API?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +init_fail:
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> +		scp_free(scp);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +
> +	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> +	if (!child)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> +
> +	of_node_put(child);
> +	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	else
> +		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
>  
> +	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> +
>  	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
>  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> +	&mt8195_of_data,
> +	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-25 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-21  2:41 [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 01/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 02/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 03/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 04/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 05/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 19:56   ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 06/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 19:59   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2023-07-26  2:55     ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 20:05   ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 09/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 10/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 11/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 12/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 13/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 20:34 ` [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 " Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZMApsFKHbj2WPLE8@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).