Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Chiu Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>,
	U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
	Gua Guo <gua.guo@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>,
	ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
	Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] schemas: Add a schema for memory map
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:58:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOXKTrC_dzN_hUkY@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822203446.4111742-1-sjg@chromium.org>

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 02:34:42PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> The Devicetree specification skips over handling of a logical view of
> the memory map, pointing users to the UEFI specification.
> 
> It is common to split firmware into 'Platform Init', which does the
> initial hardware setup and a "Payload" which selects the OS to be booted.
> Thus an handover interface is required between these two pieces.
> 
> Where UEFI boot-time services are not available, but UEFI firmware is
> present on either side of this interface, information about memory usage
> and attributes must be presented to the "Payload" in some form.

Today Linux does that by passing:

  /chosen/linux,uefi-mmap-start
  /chosen/linux,uefi-mmap-size
  /chosen/linux,uefi-mmap-desc-size
  /chosen/linux,uefi-mmap-desc-ver

... or /chosen/xen,* variants of those.

Can't we document / genericise that?

Pointing to that rather than re-encoding it in DT means that it stays in-sync
with the EFI spec and we won't back ourselves into a corner where we cannot
encode something due to a structural difference. I don't think it's a good idea
to try to re-encode it, or we're just setting ourselves up for futher pain.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> This aims to provide an initial schema for this mapping.
> 
> Note that this is separate from the existing /memory and /reserved-memory
> nodes, since it is mostly concerned with what the memory is used for. It
> may cover only a small fraction of available memory.
> 
> For now, no attempt is made to create an exhaustive binding, so there are
> some example types listed. This can be completed once this has passed
> initial review.
> 
> This binding does not include a binding for the memory 'attribute'
> property, defined by EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.GetMemoryMap(). It may be useful
> to have that as well, but perhaps not as a bit mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Reword commit message again
> - cc a lot more people, from the FFI patch
> - Split out the attributes into the /memory nodes
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Reword commit message
> 
>  dtschema/schemas/memory-map.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 dtschema/schemas/memory-map.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/dtschema/schemas/memory-map.yaml b/dtschema/schemas/memory-map.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4b06583
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/dtschema/schemas/memory-map.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
> +# Copyright 2023 Google LLC
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/memory-map.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: /memory-map nodes
> +description: |
> +  Common properties always required in /memory-map nodes. These nodes are
> +  intended to resolve the nonchalant clause 3.4.1 ("/memory node and UEFI")
> +  in the Devicetree Specification.
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    const: 'memory-map'
> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  "^([a-z][a-z0-9\\-]+@[0-9a-f]+)?$":
> +    type: object
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        minItems: 1
> +        maxItems: 1024
> +
> +      usage:
> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> +        description: |
> +          Describes the usage of the memory region, e.g.:
> +
> +            "acpi-reclaim", "acpi-nvs", "bootcode", "bootdata", "bootdata",
> +            "runtime-code", "runtime-data".
> +
> +            See enum EFI_MEMORY_TYPE in "Unified Extensible Firmware Interface
> +            (UEFI) Specification" for all the types. For now there are not
> +            listed here.
> +
> +    required:
> +      - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    memory-map {
> +        acpi@f0000 {
> +            reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>;
> +            usage = "acpi-reclaim";
> +        };
> +
> +        runtime@12300000 {
> +            reg = <0x12300000 0x28000>;
> +            usage = "runtime-code";
> +        };
> +    };
> +...
> -- 
> 2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-23  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-22 20:34 [PATCH v3 1/2] schemas: Add a schema for memory map Simon Glass
2023-08-22 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] memory: Add ECC property Simon Glass
2023-08-23  8:58 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-08-23 14:23   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] schemas: Add a schema for memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-23 20:04     ` Simon Glass
2023-08-24  9:10       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-29 16:01         ` Simon Glass
2023-08-29 19:17         ` Simon Glass
2023-08-29 21:32           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-30 21:10             ` Simon Glass
2023-08-31 12:28               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-31 19:02                 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-31 21:47                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-31 22:17                     ` Simon Glass
2023-08-31 22:39                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-09-01  1:12                         ` Simon Glass
2023-09-01 10:48                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-09-01 11:54                             ` Simon Glass

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZOXKTrC_dzN_hUkY@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=chasel.chiu@intel.com \
    --cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gua.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rminnich@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sheng.tan@9elements.com \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox