From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A15B6156CB for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 08:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="pYN/Nujv" Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 867A8CC for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 00:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507e85ebf50so5175880e87.1 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 00:59:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ferroamp-se.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1699261190; x=1699865990; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aypV7mLvbDAZeh5nBCa8xfdYAz42GegtC5Ieo6iBXzQ=; b=pYN/Nujv4bUjScDhpaO8ACPfYELWMnufbyhSaulW8Ust1pW4Pd8nyJKeWulJHwUxJc kYRNhOzFCMMI2nwJ4hSx86FmeJRi7ZNP7IkVThwbx3qCYSPMP4T+MZFVbneNJYIM3cHa oRNGcfTpArNaTzKLUSYFoFM1kMhmFaWru/+zixQIyxoVhweB2NlytbpcksFuhbEeM4Yi XkNs4pIhVejWnhfFhQp0kr4fP6ijVn0VGcFw5IOyBuWzFyUGuTYtunI82qhyVObvis3k jm5vl8sHBOW5He2ew0Xy04UAd2mo3JhMz3gMFATJBeWoC7Q40mb7PkQGiiR7unse0Mim KJkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699261190; x=1699865990; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aypV7mLvbDAZeh5nBCa8xfdYAz42GegtC5Ieo6iBXzQ=; b=exGx32BRVte52BOHfDAi4xqxjxZUdoet3ZCAvAAh5FFVmjn9gdioece4OYDuPsqDjy ozAPXk84my3q2UjS1W1t+O9WuLXCKAieVuChJibsi72zYVfqGtgUQhQLUEyPVnvooQQG DQ8DP+1nb96LI7OqbSIL9S90tpywglMfjm2vXxEPd3Wxrwj7hZ1UoVs8Piy1tAMDl1mv zLuXDNn5Se/yPmvtTReGC+Qg4b50Sft2xmocy8c6Itvp6FfkQR29JY0OsbozVLbfa1zE gliJDqVvyblZKx/KcM2+h+OMkr17nFfH+jCjwaVpsbLoLthQo4A15Kx+3KTYoJyYRCYn ug1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBnMSbCd0A+X+vYCfy1S1PaaX0gooQ/mF9c4gbOozJZVXjERc0 oORfllV4E8JBXJHiP2JeJmIRpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG3Cna/LlnMuAYULkcn1Mo/PI9szbO58Pc5YOQN/aE33Cm+GjVDfxyc/hIwpG6p77cqtp0yZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:688:b0:507:9a13:27bd with SMTP id t8-20020a056512068800b005079a1327bdmr27380714lfe.7.1699261189709; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 00:59:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([185.117.107.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y36-20020a0565123f2400b00507a8789b43sm1080387lfa.269.2023.11.06.00.59.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2023 00:59:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:46 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ram=F3n?= Nordin Rodriguez To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, horms@kernel.org, casper.casan@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] microchip: lan865x: add driver support for Microchip's LAN865X MACPHY Message-ID: References: <20231023154649.45931-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com> <20231023154649.45931-9-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: > I understand that you are using two LAN8650, isn't it? if so are they > both running simultaneously? or you are doing the testing with one alone? Currently we've only got one running, hopefully we've wrapped up the board bring up in the next few days and will be able to run the second mac/phy as well. > > With this setup I'm getting a maximum throughput of about 90kB/s. > > If I increase the chunk size / oa-cps to 64 I get a might higher > > throughput ~900kB/s, but after 0-2s I get dump below (or similar). > Did you or possible to try a test case with below configuration? > > - Single LAN8650 enabled > - UDP > - oa_cps = 64 > - spi-max-frequency = 15000000, I'll set that up and will get back to you, all testing I have performed has been with tcp. > > Did you run iperf3 test? or any other tool? > If iperf3 then can you share the configuration you used? I just tried copying a file over the network with rsync, but I'll run some udp tests with iperf. I'll do my best to get back to you with results today. > > I don't know whether these may audiences are needed in the CC for this > thread. Let's see what's Andrew Lunn thinks about it? No opinions on my end at least. BR Ramón