From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F3F199A1; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LNFB0DSQ" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3043BB; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:29:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1699270170; x=1730806170; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dVbgGjQlfi/ag2GwhO/7mrluIesj2NDfOw+Ao81CCzM=; b=LNFB0DSQAY5z8PBu1ya2aw1pjbI3+BXOrd/i4jmjgm+CgbGcZ/UPHGf4 2xmsADEfoolGvIKzoPNFwWRnxx38AeZhV4ETJ6Y97498ienrjmU8YIO+s 78D+JCde5iqKNsqvaXt7TGVCpuABNTkmGPsgMLSC/z36zLqxiZj14CB8L csIn95LzcuU5kodBqsVIpsXO1GIMcp5Uw+vmsgR1theE/NXGlQK3LiWM/ zTEp+0MXwUkOk0aPMuCkEVROweNNZ7WdC/Gu7b5+5lrCasPZGQggTrxrj 3MU/VeaTVHA8NMIFnZgR1VkNRzBrlANowkvnWCmByvOivvW+KUN8XNaYY g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10885"; a="386431930" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,281,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="386431930" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2023 03:29:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10885"; a="762294686" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,281,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="762294686" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2023 03:29:26 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97-RC3) (envelope-from ) id 1qzxnH-0000000BmAW-0nCG; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 13:29:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:29:22 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Paul Elder , Hans Verkuil , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Julien Stephan , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] device property: Add fwnode_name_eq() Message-ID: References: <20231103070631.1223643-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231103070631.1223643-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:06:31AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Add fwnode_name_eq() to implement the functionality of of_node_name_eq() > on fwnode property API. The same convention of ending the comparison at > '@' (besides NUL) is applied on also both ACPI and swnode. The function > is intended for comparing unit address-less node names on DT and firmware > or swnodes compliant with DT bindings. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko I believe I gave already the tag... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko