Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR IMX6" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR IMX6"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify reset handling by using by using *_FLAG_HAS_*_RESET
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:10:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXH8guDh+pLbg0Tn@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e314466b31dd8e88212ae5d7ac2fecf26b851829.camel@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:52:23PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> On Mi, 2023-12-06 at 10:58 -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > Refactors the reset handling logic in the imx6 PCI driver by adding
> > IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_*_RESET bitmask define for drvdata::flags.
> > 
> > The drvdata::flags and a bitmask ensures a cleaner and more scalable
> > switch-case structure for handling reset.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 115 +++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index bcf52aa86462..62d77fabd82a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> [...]
> > @@ -696,18 +698,13 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> >  
> >  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> >  {
> > -	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > -	case IMX7D:
> > -	case IMX8MQ:
> > -	case IMX8MQ_EP:
> > +	if (imx6_check_flag(imx6_pcie, IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_PHY_RESET))
> 
> This check is not strictly necessary. If the flag is not set,
> imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset is guaranteed to be NULL, and then
> reset_control_assert() is a no-op. Same for the other (de)assert
> calls below.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -1335,36 +1319,24 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  					     "failed to get pcie phy\n");
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > -	case IMX7D:
> > -		if (dbi_base->start == IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR)
> > -			imx6_pcie->controller_id = 1;
> > -
> > -		imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
> > -									    "pciephy");
> > -		if (IS_ERR(imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset)) {
> > -			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PCIEPHY reset control\n");
> > -			return PTR_ERR(imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset);
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		imx6_pcie->apps_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
> > -									 "apps");
> > -		if (IS_ERR(imx6_pcie->apps_reset)) {
> > -			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PCIE APPS reset control\n");
> > -			return PTR_ERR(imx6_pcie->apps_reset);
> > -		}
> > -		break;
> > -	case IMX8MM:
> > -	case IMX8MM_EP:
> > -	case IMX8MP:
> > -	case IMX8MP_EP:
> > -		imx6_pcie->apps_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
> > -									 "apps");
> > +	if (imx6_check_flag(imx6_pcie, IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_APP_RESET)) {
> > +		imx6_pcie->apps_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "apps");
> [...]
> 
> I wonder whether we should just defer the check whether apps/pciephy
> resets should be used to the device tree validation, and make this an
> unconditional call to get an optional reset control:
> 
> 	imx6_pcie->apps_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, "apps");

I think double check here is neccesary. No sure if dts file version
binding yaml was exactly matched driver. Sometime user use old version dts. 
Double check here will help identify the dts problem. 

Frank 
> 
> regards
> Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-07 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-06 15:58 [PATCH 0/9] PCI: imx6: Clean up and add imx95 pci support Frank Li
2023-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify clock handling by using HAS_CLK_* bitmask Frank Li
2023-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify phy handling by using by using IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_PHY Frank Li
2023-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify reset handling by using by using *_FLAG_HAS_*_RESET Frank Li
2023-12-06 16:52   ` Philipp Zabel
2023-12-07 17:10     ` Frank Li [this message]
2023-12-08 11:49       ` Philipp Zabel
2023-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: imx6: Using "linux,pci-domain" as slot ID Frank Li
2023-12-06 16:36   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-12-06 16:50     ` Frank Li
2023-12-06 16:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-12-06 17:07         ` Frank Li
2023-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify ltssm_enable() by using ltssm_off and ltssm_mask Frank Li
2023-12-06 15:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify configure_type() by using mode_off and mode_mask Frank Li
2023-12-07 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-06 15:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] PCI: imx6: Simplify switch-case logic by involve init_phy callback Frank Li
2023-12-07  9:35   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-06 15:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add imx95 pcie compatible string Frank Li
2023-12-07  8:30   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 15:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 PCIe support Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXH8guDh+pLbg0Tn@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox