From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC8C20FA81 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744371646; cv=none; b=cnXXKJrl8AHJVYyPHe76Anp0SOv6TQbZpP+ddmnYgsML8uMW+v85nD4e5Q6VWpy10p59qI9Ar0nT44bliLz2vLmFKbwZuKgrib2mry0Ch2dvJUyDUoJnjcpNVscCknEbIE0IqBlY2ib4+42c8TdNjadZt3VsFZqqdGXoHNkMm9U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744371646; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7D7DwKH4Z28/lnIj8g9PPDtM+tjAkRdvH/ab0w7e6Qc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sAhX0WXEawAg/yRp40nFWaUNxpqPMwPBX1V3gtaiB+8PhwhNWe9MUy3+lhW0KHirGwmDU/ELQGeUEvpd7PiTlLXZoIOOfQliU1WcK3R9Pn3SDNEF6PefdJ6Jmsc9dZNP6V4OuLVD0e+CDbcdVVW0qSnAz6NUQXNdPXrgIocCWKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=WCvDM6JX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="WCvDM6JX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=/y4u xEyL5puU+gIeFGFN1UxWPVX2K0jI9A2dB9O4HKc=; b=WCvDM6JXTBfcINSEgghX VY8rb8Dp9JRoWvMdw1K+XeM05MZYVqOJt/+WYPhHaQ2BpVjaA617bankzZEJ/pm5 uO+kdT9dn9gUAcEHG2MGx6uQAY0J8obLGTTAB8cEuvmHKQ+DkGa98IeXKL6msB24 v+e12OE3s2+zzlIjQdsTer2Wvuk5kuP+FNYjk28dXJ/2F7oBPBu0cemSg55fsOzs EY7EumEDyzqYqq/2n7tK+MW1g9XdaI0lcfIfTy37cky3ScZJ6V1khFWqlxcMaYoS e4XKRZiFdvI9sY7xuw/guNLxLMtEWuEiA+XAnSbozsP9nu+h1k6UP0ZpikhdgjVP 3A== Received: (qmail 1279329 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2025 13:40:39 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 11 Apr 2025 13:40:39 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@UJ/oK38yaJsgAwDPXyfYALbiJ46yNPq3 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:40:39 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032-rzn1d400-db: describe LEDs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20250328153134.2881-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250328153134.2881-11-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mn4nbnL+OdRk3A5O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --mn4nbnL+OdRk3A5O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > These are called LED1-LED8 in the Board Setup Notes. Oh, where? I have a version from "Dec 14, 2020" which only calls them Software-LEDs or "Port0 BitX". Schematics call them DBG_LEDx. I don't care much. The "db" board has a "USER LED2", as long as we don't conflict with that name, I am fine. > color =3D ; Hmmm, they are definitely GREEN here. > function =3D LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR; LED_FUNCTION_PROGRAMMING? > Perhaps you want the first one to be a heartbeat? >=20 > linux,default-trigger =3D "heartbeat"; I recently removed a default-trigger on another board because it was in the way. So, I'd rather not. Phew, starting with the PHY LEDs on this board, didn't know LED were so troublesome... Shall I resend only this patch and rebased on the keyboard patch? Or resend the both? --mn4nbnL+OdRk3A5O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmf4/7MACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbM+g/+JA9RSj8/Ajgtvn9dNlrwyMvp+0eIYiMKujGEpEqPlbxnMSxTcpEBQHzq 9bVqKlXLU4vhg+IgjXdQZ/iynt/yXjOHY7BSd4LWOWm2bg/eYqNBiSPprTzJl2Cw ZtH15OcBuufGAXgOrXN+zGY125IkflNjvvg/bbDqZX+g2+rc7FiT8+GGp5CjqY+7 G2J36wDtR3XHRmWSFl9vYnV1qxYX9cizX7IF926c3E7SLmLAvSZwM5RHafG3iaXS osdTx09Yn8frl6Q9xsVkeSRawfyq0/iW8exJQqG3ZzxewZsxezfajSpJ6U5/RWut 9qBGJ9vfT15HY13P7qhz7zm7UgQjDLBNnsyEmkVVwqLW2QVc5l3FvT3N0AMVNTJK lMis3hnvqyioD4fCWXSj6l002dNEGLpF9/M1JiISQaX8146fNADQzYogPfvZqzn/ a8yp2WOwvmfZ2IyD8E2dUVJ7cVUCwGn26DuIYvAc5rtLWOzTJ452sdLxRtcOSAeB ar6z8GPfAiXageEwgLjhZAeGKk88pQIRnemFkhADnPoft4ICT1CfNF8WqGcKvoHo 5zMLcsgWQ02falfcxncwhcWsxsXMZY/8oa1OYav9G8CccMfK8mvg8Uwoqs/Lu2n6 OTMnEiayLdsOwO4TnrADE8Kh68n3NiYkPIpnYED1M34QSRaFl0g= =Zj+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mn4nbnL+OdRk3A5O--