From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1E926988E for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744398728; cv=none; b=PjLQPlRrEFQf4KB25uVzY340AuPcEdltagmEPXtgRIuDZ0m7o5ykf1REvyuqZ7Iab4bBWt5VtjOf4zWYt+6/HHF8uVXNNRNIFHxslRWlHL6FHVL58Huur9a6BFRm63EanhoTz0xrm7RmGPLabLSxsz20cRKueP9dD9TKU496rTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744398728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x5328n9Po4MAp4s+nhheKJVWEt9qvIrfr+K17nPBjxM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EZB+Gt2wO+pbkEM8yzQEFOisZtqYgjnyalLNIlkgg/1VIksR+TCiIFeA48WzioDG6bIxH6ifMQQHvCHFvKASVsSFkSgEuYWuehMpsOSWJcdAvS4Qos08qfaOf6UZ9/v+G7dxhClce56OJBgooEz3dP3L8aCZ+pmqe1t69ZQHCFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=mC36692/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="mC36692/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=x532 8n9Po4MAp4s+nhheKJVWEt9qvIrfr+K17nPBjxM=; b=mC36692/iEOT3fodsSEj uFQb9ftoh+KvrdVp0UW976rY6qr/6Zfs8eFr9eRSLqO/EYPnsJBeEjbU2tqVYGLW 3tNz2VDHKN4LZFpKSlUQeIrIIfOvfM9PN4+wYhjLWu+Y3w93KDW4QfI/JmjnAtzE NYi49qcARB0npirHJjWnLer6i+FMSKPM2vViW+LKhIpdRgd7DiI8gw7QLCgT8kKb egI7MUIjbZkCUNwCxeKGeGm9fJEq3sbxA/Yoa4boAwaiQxErZObPAKU+yKslW/gj lz7JwDDS1GMDvsAHlfsCzO5YF5ApTeJrqU7Zx/LfJRrVW6zY2q8Ks8uuyZHli+Sb Zg== Received: (qmail 1399403 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2025 21:12:01 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 11 Apr 2025 21:12:01 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@AyIeeoUyQJ8ujnsS Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:12:00 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Rob Herring Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: Simplify DMA-less RZ/N1 rule Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <90c7aa143beb6a28255b24e8ef8c96180d869cbb.1744271974.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> <20250411161620.GA3329787-robh@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UVDKZ3tj4v23nX18" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250411161620.GA3329787-robh@kernel.org> --UVDKZ3tj4v23nX18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > IMO, whether you drop the platform is orthogonal to this patch.=20 Ok. > Whether or not the platform can run Linux is irrelevant to whether there= =20 Yes and no. I know what you mean with "irrelevant" and I agree to that. But... > are bindings. Can it run u-boot? Now, if no one is going to make the=20 > bindings complete and upstream a .dts for it, then remove it. =2E.. also this. If the SoC can hardly run Linux (if at all) it is a lot less likely in practice that someone will complete the upstream support, no? --UVDKZ3tj4v23nX18 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmf5aXwACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbUvA//eg0OOqgCn9QEbFxWpMpiomFIaiLL/hN+32z9/07MpFunNjoqhGKiCzoF nVxmiI7GdoV0nG90pfYnkTk9g7jpOcNTL5Xzrod0mZZGQrHUzo2eRT3tHv6qu22e LaY3lZTcXghv4Us7iK3K8ysAqu/HxYsBTjNzubFwWm2g1VdCkqRyWU8/VNxxs5en 9Lbqoyc1FTLWTYnTmgrL8uAmvZlaXQhC8YjRiBaK0ouMgE5m8L4uKl4qYossu6N7 FpjDiAlKGbg0jGwIs6uDrBLWRjdzqV7dqXAW5o9p0q2gvM+UBZK7Hat5KD+O3Kjp vQ8BRGuzkCvzliBMkAz7QJvhE6kijV7jD1fhlY9f4IbYgce83Od+bVFfmHGXSI4E WXh0LSNo1FiqdZYXkYua6BDJ9BtAUHMn8yAgnf/lRuXH45Rii0OH5ROFvpKOGymS 5iGnJsbAczynt0YvLtEm+ChqJZEHYwaFpCAELSLTE3uU7QViPf6oyzqHGqEKXtrC S0McEFmRbvGH7yz3mf6b1bExzT0BEMJRCFMcPv4Xjh/ZQ6UHdpNFK1BFKlQLoypA 0QI06K479tiWE9wvDo91f17mEjB2DGDHNTfITFda+KpbeWt8T3Fyh8qQqcZRaSy8 h4aJcOvM+sdRjpMkIUklLFIULApSg6ek4Te4tl7JUhobZ6cCN7U= =mOpZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UVDKZ3tj4v23nX18--