devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	balbi@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com, pku.leo@gmail.com,
	sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add system bus request info
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:23:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbA8ea9Ex+hMdDDZ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46781012-2678-4f6c-9aee-b020cabcbb28@linaro.org>

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:46:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/01/2024 20:22, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:42:27PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 01:02:21PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:51:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:49:27PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:27:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:02:05PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >>>>>>> Add device tree binding allow platform overwrite default value of *REQIN in
> >>>>>>> GSBUSCFG0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why might a platform actually want to do this? Why does this need to be
> >>>>>> set at the board level and being aware of which SoC is in use is not
> >>>>>> sufficient for the driver to set the correct values?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In snps,dwc3.yaml, there are already similary proptery, such as
> >>>>> snps,incr-burst-type-adjustment. Use this method can keep whole dwc3 usb
> >>>>> driver keep consistent. And not all platform try enable hardware
> >>>>> dma_cohenrence. It is configable for difference platform.
> >>>>
> >>>> When you say "platform", what do you mean? I understand that term to
> >>>> mean a combination of board, soc and firmware.
> >>>
> >>> In my company's environment, "platform" is "board". I will use "board" in
> >>> future. Is it big difference here?
> >>
> >> Nah, that's close enough that it makes no difference here.
> >>
> >> I'd still like an explanation for why a platform would need to actually
> >> set these properties though, and why information about coherency cannot
> >> be determined from whether or not the boss the usb controller is on is
> >> communicated to be dma coherent via the existing devicetree properties
> >> for that purpose.
> > 
> > Actually, I am not very clear about reason. I guest maybe treat off power
> > consumption and performance.
> > 
> > What's your judgement about proptery, which should be in dts. Such as
> > reg, clk, reset, dma and irq, which is tighted with SOC. It is the fixed
> > value for every SOC. The board dts never change these.
> 
> Then it can be deduced from the compatible and there is no need for new
> properties.

Okay, I think "*reqinfo" match this. When new Soc(using compatible dwc usb
controller) appear regardless dma-cohorence or not, connect by AXI3 or
AXI4, needn't add new propterties. 

Frank

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-23 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23 17:02 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add system bus request info Frank Li
2024-01-23 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: core: allow overwrite reqinfo in GSBUSCFG0 by dts Frank Li
2024-01-23 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add system bus request info Conor Dooley
2024-01-23 17:49   ` Frank Li
2024-01-23 17:51     ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-23 18:02       ` Frank Li
2024-01-23 18:42         ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-23 19:22           ` Frank Li
2024-01-23 21:46             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-23 22:23               ` Frank Li [this message]
2024-01-29 15:19                 ` Frank Li
2024-01-29 16:49                   ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-29 17:41                     ` Frank Li
2024-01-30  7:40                       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-30 15:20                         ` Frank Li
2024-01-30 16:10                           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-08 21:20                             ` Frank Li
2024-02-09  7:31                               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-23 18:37 ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbA8ea9Ex+hMdDDZ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=pku.leo@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).