From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37715CA69; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706092390; cv=none; b=IQbjjWe6HXer5lE7XkKgMxw6xf49ibT+W9rS7gicRAy5DHm0k49YFkIJ7cMlFu6wGPMzs/zgoegOC06eSOSL9LJBISg4S1dsaHvKpTN0i2PU2eY3ym41G1RlPGf3AkCVhpdmkFsVWUwHFL51yF/UkCK6gO9zPYnKJaDJ0PUocEo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706092390; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QD7I+J4Pf8NtWbUrntxxfjNeIlISBQDWP+H6sxsWVZQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VthNXRdB9zfDrdkrtuSZFmpzI3q7Q76xN4iRR1DDvHIAQVwEM9XGrN13jj0Qx3KHKrMuKU29r0tQJjb8C/jsnD3qbAbDgkzBLjRrwaYZfqTzD6hjaKAC8bQJBXRJLzyS01yxZPu6toNh3qGccVpyI3o5z+cI1h3qtHH0wbSjf/0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PNWRQZyO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PNWRQZyO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29668C433F1; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:33:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706092388; bh=QD7I+J4Pf8NtWbUrntxxfjNeIlISBQDWP+H6sxsWVZQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PNWRQZyOatwXlBGQvJDsDVJ34Le/H3AxtH/5MDbRKQrDFc6asgcuDrP21wT4Xca2h ZpOIHK7ecnO6r8ERQL4HLej4pAKEZkuqj/kZBeKEFz9Eblr+SNlCEZT211l3rSmMD+ xWnB2ELNM5qd1AsjupKnzMWT+3yIuACEO1M45ySTroAH5+pFTLLaqauG1A53qgFRrU yyjXS+/QnDt5byUFx3wG13ulE0AMkK0duU0gyRU04hgPG7pkI8iukDQ5hyn8iX2SQn vAV6DPKmPY0QQnBVgb4q1vycZ7tBCLJZpCMTjLJEBrsmv85Dac2aWYTl8W5GXmnsGN fSTXODTkmo98A== Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:33:05 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Philipp Zabel , Magnus Damm , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ulf Hansson , Cong Dang , Duy Nguyen , Hai Pham , Linh Phung , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add R8A779H0 V4M CPG Core Clock Definitions Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Philipp Zabel , Magnus Damm , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ulf Hansson , Cong Dang , Duy Nguyen , Hai Pham , Linh Phung , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org References: <2e083461752c9d52fdb251ad9071f6111f13c3c5.1704726960.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JHmIAnmx0irpJ8zR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --JHmIAnmx0irpJ8zR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > For new bindings, or also for existing ones? > > Doing the former means there are inconsistencies among different SoCs > > in the same family. >=20 > For the new ones. It's just naming inconsistency which does not cause > any issues. Otherwise you never move to vendor,device.h format... which > is not that critical, but in the long term brings uniformity. I haven't reviewed the patch itself, but for the naming scheme I'd suggest to follow Krzysztof's suggestion. If he is OK with this level of uniformity, then all is good, I'd say. Converting existing ones sounds more messy to me. --JHmIAnmx0irpJ8zR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmWw52EACgkQFA3kzBSg Kbayqg//U3URnhB+/r6yDwETdfY9sdnsq0CxUPhFVLCcdNNoIvT4Jr8IBmQcL4Wm +9hwQxqN9NyjgFJLHxP7bap9G5yJEGP3Wl9Ca7e9HTQfgvfGIdCrmJW/6nTm7G9s P3v9Gx+vnthNdHFTu2ufapgk34pN99A0aa6jDozVDLqxn8cKWAIFTGUv/djRlJEk fm+L1nH+l6UZfLXHha5Wz5uM4RzGk1OqWW8wSaYe9Rc06ZX6v86saOyfOy8OiuPX xyyO970ozg+Uiv9UqFTPV6shuye6HkIR3SJvL4F1qsPQswT4iMTm6f2Cy6UG9ADZ zoqXLtFFeddDwRiVjsbjf4xX1ni/Qo5HYueYNsoHue2o2YZG3w/ZKi6Ev/zgdmZP QNQ8zS2IpSo6IIQcbStYtEtVkatu0WgaKrjgXAxHgkL2LEaGGScwyGTrUvkneufD XttcM6/Ny6jZxjgWg5o6X5ge6Bo0bLxV/VnMhuZvr5YVS8N8HZq78cQV8lyzLjJO zM5Vyc6myAeOVxTUlU2EG97p1lRiOe9ooXDlFAUl/eIDcmuEE/14eGcVA5kjnKOp fgWnQ4ASq/U1SpNjte5xkQjbU4KNLG9wQ3xhmtiWF3bk4+9ioExplCQxkWNft/EF XGhEiUi5ICVj0KG+ezC3BkM9u6cjlbT4j68wvB9owProSTIJiak= =HrJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JHmIAnmx0irpJ8zR--