From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40AE112AAC0; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706122729; cv=none; b=K5RWsKYdg2rswrk5PxtGh2ZoCXbNCH1vYGjQevU1EkraTqCQckuCVdSgNYjSvLXoZe8ntjes2Xg2MGTeyUITpRSnL/Zboch2rpwWfmZ57v91W0z6JO65T6l7FCdqaunqdU3HbJ+wAOxqA5NSBNH9V9UEMCvRUiye1csq8+LssFM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706122729; c=relaxed/simple; bh=idpivWfwh0y0q2Kq4FzfMntFi5dUXTuAC4flqOAXS3s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DLScr/prbAMHVJkHxfcsEaC/5QJUFbFXcWef3kN7SfYpuFLMrZgUMXl5f7b2kWcM40LrNCYVTFKIPoFFVQFgRJlmEQzfcpGLPtPgS2U2fLDAFg+fZHXSP7qkdRPUctrv5MuNPU6O9kDZnF+P9LR4BH0UtFmGSRd/1fZR7Yaejgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b=j9mgSg72; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b="j9mgSg72" Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 087C31C0076; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:58:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucw.cz; s=gen1; t=1706122718; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=idpivWfwh0y0q2Kq4FzfMntFi5dUXTuAC4flqOAXS3s=; b=j9mgSg72l5T6vbfY+R9izxsUIOURfKlNIzDD5yoBUEJ7PEpZ34psQdIIbBt2QaboxYLFA2 c2FyiPuQ+7mD0zLnsn5GsbcRq2BUSNWxATbUcP7K5WOLIflJHe64UmJsx0jBiYMLd645B5 8XS2d/1q05d6Nu6qmNoDQlwjcBjpLKI= Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:58:38 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Andrey Skvortsov Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman , Alain Volmat , Arnaud Ferraris Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sun50i-a64-pinephone: Add front/back cameras Message-ID: References: <20240123214729.2852346-1-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240123214729.2852346-1-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> Hi! > Pinephone has OV5640 back camera and GC2145 front camera. Add support > for both. Thanks for doing this. I'm currently fighting with kexec on pinephone (it crashes as soon as I pass dtb) so I did not test this, but hw description looks fine. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek