From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6573A28B; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707745440; cv=none; b=ky5ytH4dJcyWbh54hJ48sy3q8fe0V0OgXLgfNvxLfAK4FJ2MbKXugAlsYfs2exCLMp2T7w5JUgsLdbne/CbGvaEw7QCiuSYjlXJeKBwQSwH5g3xydFgZWozNxBr0eYTV02ZYGzkPz9QZe/Evzh1CwNRy957FVEaIuq9BFAWxz30= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707745440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ReFfb4Ca/K0nRT7HGDlG5FJYa8HVxtgFYOvGETOwcfE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=o+i1wKBniUI/TlOAVshoVdCHDP6V+w5tb2VKwPwkl0x0TOlef1tGs3GbwNDasTOX5FtUGOLJJzTvd73VIKy8NjN4SKZ0ne0hK5hBP+5+a4C/j1OBvU8xsxJk22nxLNKxouGmtpFUIAfEu/QkQ8gBA5NgRCytPQCRTXVrDCawi0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AOo6nEDx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AOo6nEDx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707745438; x=1739281438; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ReFfb4Ca/K0nRT7HGDlG5FJYa8HVxtgFYOvGETOwcfE=; b=AOo6nEDxe6ucOz1S9QCPoA74tvFVf+hwQ7J8Ti4+NbymUSeqsOCi4WNX 7FH/4kTGxBFc1XARW/q/vFHO56RU6mPsIIQOwBkGKnob0hZIeev2K8NXD VOPxeoIf7GR5ayPAy5B3F41/BBHIJz7EFmFi0WUDMouTfxrtySUtJCeJk sGq8LZgzhOZstYFW4aBg6sh2eXRzqTVuxBfHgWlBMCD2/tYSrSLfkGMJF niCsAUIQm+txwa/d4qmMNrYPxq7ptR6oq9zQCZPRAOVX39bZxgYnUb2n8 7zHb8R8Cktkij5SWCd38UpQhrRGEGbbyJ+XQ6EqE3FRR80OYEbevgYf1+ g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10981"; a="5533892" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,264,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="5533892" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2024 05:43:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10981"; a="911485132" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,264,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="911485132" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2024 05:43:54 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rZWb9-00000003uR5-2c5X; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:43:51 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:43:51 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Ralf Schlatterbeck , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Walleij , Miguel Ojeda , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robin van der Gracht , Paul Burton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node Message-ID: References: <20240212083426.26757-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <2922eece-5486-4eff-af99-f7060cb61d17@linaro.org> <20240212115837.efz73yxinkysdmgh@runtux.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: ... > Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated > solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several > other variations and combinations. Is this documented? In any case, you would need to amend your series one way or another. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko