From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD934CE13; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707746659; cv=none; b=SHtS6L/RhRzNLMLL9RrxXB9PTJlX26tjPP+eyXVCiLODCrDdmWIsSpScccr92XZ5N7i+8/+DwQU5x2YO5z9E6+Oa6lTRqI9yR4HJUcDiu9quhP9o73td/pC1Z3gkdRrjZOQVQmtb/o0qMIH9WiikvJm05u6NiSZcfgzgHmrzruo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707746659; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kzWubUFjeWgniWqds5o3I9UShRuEGy8wlJtxZHCh1NY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kzin1R0z1tosMB2+awIWdXfAmdjaXvrzleLpATkyeP3r0GBby7boI4HTNzhaeWcYOfiHAZAZ0rNKEw/8hrpOhYqD4/qzjXVm2xZS1rM08ScN9jLaf4OzB5mFaVHza/cpipq8VE+QRKOre1H744K/s3Iukk63j599DDzXKvkYDw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=n33n+3iX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="n33n+3iX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707746658; x=1739282658; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kzWubUFjeWgniWqds5o3I9UShRuEGy8wlJtxZHCh1NY=; b=n33n+3iXu6VdKe3eaXoKRu8ZhOKili5xDihavmmgWdCBdTxNxR/kyLAK DKuVDiXeabpZ/SYo/kWHWCtDKK/gfK7DL0asBRXluPMmOONPFyjaljy4b rHc1Wh8JAVLcoEw2TL1QpuwsIUrfW4pzgvmupiWobH9EaYBiyeOtY882T HLnarCBVwL4289OMEbHEdZPg2kVCXnwltLH5FkuwGxrWxIgIPDCIGdzcJ wyFAOTNws6tCTgO37pJbz6bQo/ZXUOWkxmWeKetI3tVZbHJ4DYzvZ/wxZ dEyQpsr2+e/H6UEqDqT/LEyKgOKNGtEFke3mPRWlZicO6BGWQ120gQG2D Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10981"; a="5536271" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,264,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="5536271" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2024 06:04:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10981"; a="911491167" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,264,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="911491167" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2024 06:04:12 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rZWun-00000003upH-2z5c; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:04:09 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:04:09 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Ralf Schlatterbeck , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Walleij , Miguel Ojeda , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robin van der Gracht , Paul Burton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node Message-ID: References: <20240212083426.26757-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <2922eece-5486-4eff-af99-f7060cb61d17@linaro.org> <20240212115837.efz73yxinkysdmgh@runtux.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: ... > >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated > >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several > >> other variations and combinations. > > > > Is this documented? > > Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple > times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I > briefly mentioned it also in my talks. Good to know, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko