From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] firmware: imx: support BBM module
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:04:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdyabHM25C9TF7cm@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202-imx95-bbm-misc-v1-4-3cb743020933@nxp.com>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:34:42PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> The BBM module provides RTC and BUTTON feature. To i.MX95, this module
> is managed by System Manager. Linux could use i.MX SCMI BBM Extension
> protocol to use RTC and BUTTON feature.
>
> This driver is to use SCMI interface to get/set RTC, enable pwrkey.
>
Hi some further remarks questin about pwrkey down below.
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/imx/sm-bbm.c | 317 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 318 insertions(+)
>
[snip]
> +static int scmi_imx_bbm_pwrkey_init(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
> + struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
> + struct scmi_imx_bbm *bbnsm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct input_dev *input;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "linux,code", &bbnsm->keycode)) {
> + bbnsm->keycode = KEY_POWER;
> + dev_warn(dev, "key code is not specified, using default KEY_POWER\n");
> + }
This linux,code binding prop is searched in the SCMI device node, BUT
your BB< protocol binding does NOT mention it at all.
> +
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bbnsm->check_work, scmi_imx_bbm_pwrkey_check_for_events);
> +
> + input = devm_input_allocate_device(dev);
> + if (!input) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate the input device for SCMI IMX BBM\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + input->name = dev_name(dev);
> + input->phys = "bbnsm-pwrkey/input0";
> + input->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
> +
> + input_set_capability(input, EV_KEY, bbnsm->keycode);
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, scmi_imx_bbm_pwrkey_act, bbnsm);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register remove action\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + bbnsm->input = input;
> +
> + ret = handle->notify_ops->devm_event_notifier_register(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_IMX_BBM,
> + SCMI_EVENT_IMX_BBM_BUTTON,
> + NULL, &bbnsm->nb);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register BBM Button Events %d:", ret);
> +
> + ret = input_register_device(input);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register input device\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I suppose you cannot use std SystemPower protocol and scmi_power_control
existent upstream driver because you are configuring the event keycode that
is associated with your button press event using linux,code DT properies
looked up above, right ? (which you need to define somewhere as said
above..)
I was thinking that maybe handling events associated with generic button-presses
could be done via some std SCMI protocols like PINCTRL/GPIO (IF IT HAD NOTIFICATIONS)
and some custom SCMI gpio-keys driver in the future (not now clearly :D)...thoughts ?
Thanks,
Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 6:34 [PATCH 0/5] firmware: support i.MX95 SCMI BBM/MISC Extenstion Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: firmware: add i.MX SCMI Extension protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-12 15:09 ` Rob Herring
2024-04-07 12:35 ` Peng Fan
2024-02-23 11:38 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for i.MX BBM protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-23 13:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-01 10:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for i.MX MISC protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-23 15:56 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] firmware: imx: support BBM module Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-04 4:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-23 18:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-06-20 13:17 ` Peng Fan
2024-02-26 14:04 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2024-02-02 6:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] firmware: imx: add i.MX95 MISC driver Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-02-23 18:35 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-26 13:31 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdyabHM25C9TF7cm@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).