From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3E52BAFC for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712752555; cv=none; b=QX46ZCX5r33rawIpWMJbCHVhqum8E5J1rtvLZfdnHoQdyxD7vU3/5DcMM/Sf7SL9cNmzr2mfJ35Z7vo10e7DXjl7dhMIbAyzHSTsy3z50+6HyUAx1uFX19B3eLuSPWldSYNk1omoMPA/s9D2RBYZEkSVu7wvNW7o75TgelEgp2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712752555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=95ohHFHwkpGENyEhl5ROyHQR0kMyL4UbUY27yOFmZ6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UcQxf486eBibUKuQhjAk12BWOaqT0pJoORsAPyCaYulG7Oks5DOUb0FfXXlOjelBZNReDZ6hH1TW1plNqOl4TVJASjgKzOLeyy+Hr7SxTDP7VyMikzYucYvNCkpMjGMaXhp+Rf+EjJOsYBN9jo+4VrxePPmKBXCyr6d/M1ZrL6U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3858139F; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 141CE3F6C4; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:35:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: Ulf Hansson , Cristian Marussi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Update examples for protocol@13 Message-ID: References: <20240403111106.1110940-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20240410115637.GA4042282-robh@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240410115637.GA4042282-robh@kernel.org> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:56:37AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:52:08PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 15:53, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > Recently we extended the binding for protocol@13 to allow it to be modelled > > > > as a generic performance domain. In a way to promote using the new binding, > > > > let's update the examples. > > > > > > > > > > Does it make sense to keep one DVFS example with #clock-cells until we > > > mark it as deprecated ? Otherwise it may be confusing as the binding still > > > lists. Or leave some comment in the example or something, I am open for > > > suggestions. > > > > I am certainly fine with either way! > > > > However, if we intend to make #clock-cells deprecated down the road, > > maybe it's better to start avoiding the use of it already now. That > > said, what do you think of following up $subject patch with an update > > to Juno's dts(i) to move to #power-domains-cells too? That would mean > > we get a nice reference for how to use this too. > > > > > > > > Other than that, > > > > > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > > > Are you picking this via your scmi tree, or which route is this going? > Sorry Ulf, this slipped through the cracks, will queue it. > Please take via SCMI tree. > Sure > Acked-by: Rob Herring Thanks -- Regards, Sudeep