From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924E3502B0 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712917013; cv=none; b=tQSt2z6/Fbnxt93XkB9Vs9OHBzxp9ZsI/LgNzirIJPZl33VAqfD5s5Mv9gjp4Ofb23QDqtQIA1hNjog3YDtqgH8yyMTcPdomAsZ/lgXQna4W93DC9no7z+KgybFfG/BCH1TKL0GlTaOHXO3eKGJZ3Syh7AtAC8SI2N5M3egCuoE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712917013; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n6Oa2PfIJNxa2Mv/c7/Platjp6eUnnPUvbAMdd+9kY8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t5pYxVSRUyu/bfPnngGDamZ6mVNAMaR2lkDn4xvxS+BT7O8pDCC3S3SvFc/qNI9OtNKAeNOIA5PETjze/0jehdmCNgBEsSE82xnNAi4ltpvePGR7U9JMa5ie+L/2R6zG2fsrxtUMWD19uI5AR9P/QLZIq8MHKQM5RjHSlfBWxBM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256EF339; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 03:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CBCF3F64C; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 03:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:16:47 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Nikunj Kela , Conor Dooley , Sudeep Holla , Srinivas Kandagatla , Trilok Soni , Ulf Hansson , Manivannan Sadhasivam , krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, Vincent Guittot , robh+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Prasad Sodagudi (QUIC)" Subject: Re: DT Query on "New Compatible vs New Property" Message-ID: References: <33783999-227b-4837-9924-2fd99b210cbb@linaro.org> <20240411-platinum-phonics-864bb08dab8d@spud> <5293ec04-917d-4df5-8ff9-58b12cf01bf0@quicinc.com> <7ed6da09-936d-4142-ad90-a9e90435ebbb@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ed6da09-936d-4142-ad90-a9e90435ebbb@linaro.org> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:29:17PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Just to clarify: Ulf agreed on compatible way for proof of concept and > asked to send a code so everyone can understand better what you are > making. I don't recall any Linaro policy or answer. > > After above email, other people proposed other solutions and disagreed > with that statement, so no, you do not have a consensus. > > Trying to present this as a consensus if way exaggerated. > > You have no conclusion, because talk is cheap and this thread is way too > big. It's also way to vague, like we had to poke you for several emails > to get hardware description. I still don't recall it, but TBH, I am not > going to look at 50 email thread for one email. > > Therefore, feel free to propose something, but if you call it "that was > the consensus from community" then please already add there my > Nacked-by, because there was no consensus. > > In your proposal finally describe your hardware, firmware and problem > which you are solving (because no one will be going back to this thread). > I can't agree more, well summarised. Nikunj, Sorry I read this email after I responded to you, so please ignore my suggestion on starting a fresh thread, follow Krzysztof's suggestion instead. But all other points in my email still stands. -- Regards, Sudeep