From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE41E4A2; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717422896; cv=none; b=rJbV1LDPi3qickWUCOB3+n+HyAFSm+cW5PoyWzVx+Gp7MsTuNB9z6iKVOwqlO/kADQFpV1BjK6gp36WzLYdcN/1wLDz2TAwE7V82g6JtUVRfXWplcm87PYwBWwWb9tttZb5osLCUP/LXFZZ6LdtbgOSm33d8f3KZqOcrfIj+JjU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717422896; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vTTzcuOT0hu+3Euns8TOuKgbuBxigYHbPABPbaEJeKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hhENkJsWqYCzFIY/YrwOu6GJrSnPhn2QZ/hraaa+V5IKhsCxmvY2qifxMMbRam6HfFzo3Kq8qZNA8CUoS9IzYIa/fyHizasVVhGJ2IHNe+K5GKYgEH0+rIQwupr0CnA1w/cN6HwqeKW5Wl3EOUm6fjbp2CGTApXW3fWkNwOkpuA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15F1042; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 06:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50EDA3F64C; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 06:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:54:49 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Linus Walleij , Aisheng Dong , Jacky Bai , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property Message-ID: References: <20240521-pinctrl-scmi-imx95-v1-0-9a1175d735fd@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with > > fsl,pins property > > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking i.MX95 > upstream support. > I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window. So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise. I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux kernel development. But you are no new to kernel development. In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon. I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in this thread. -- Regards, Sudeep