From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34639BE7F; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717503120; cv=none; b=HAmKqiQr7sIsrBZwWhOCyn6+rOpKv7vohddVz817bLAFbbfHPFsEqE6bKTFIoYzVAE2V7V/oFADf48WTEsnkbblZyBYUU0QNprOsmqcZvh+sGdrfRXfo0MtSkq0x/Stodn2EO6LW0Pgzxmw9ucVA4X1WTTktMqPknEZC9w4c5RE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717503120; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wfMB6wCVIVE3buY4hRYr213PVqIlWEwpBco1dUMXonw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GwJiUDYw1L+/OyGahhKuwm2vfEe17TN8D9PtNmZfdaOG12+PJ5Xu2UcrHs4vOCiZ0S/t5vjdu8licmTn2KA4KAJc0MS64ZcypAHAS9n5uZCp2qlxrGO//49oTNDIzzCnmidx7Q76jsnXPauCQINW9wyhTh7/GlJ5kc7UrnrRqbk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F491042; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 05:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D07B3F64C; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:54 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Linus Walleij , Aisheng Dong , Jacky Bai , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property Message-ID: References: <20240521-pinctrl-scmi-imx95-v1-0-9a1175d735fd@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 12:49:13AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with > > fsl,pins property > > > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions > > > > with fsl,pins property > > > > > > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking > > > i.MX95 upstream support. > > > > > > > I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window. > > So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise. > > > > I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux kernel > > development. But you are no new to kernel development. > > > > In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent > > patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon. > > I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent > > patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored > > and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in > > this thread. > > Thanks for your suggestion. I tried to do different implementations that > could make all of us agree, so it was indeed many versions with different > implementations. Sorry. I will improve. > Thanks and sorry again if it is harsh but it was indeed confusing. > BTW: would you please also give an ACK for patch 3, because patch 3 uses > module_scmi_driver? Done. -- Regards, Sudeep