* [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
@ 2024-06-28 3:03 Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-01 17:04 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2024-06-28 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sudeep.holla, cristian.marussi, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, linux-kernel, arm-scmi, Peng Fan
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is 0x12.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
index 4d823f3b1f0e..ebf384e76df1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ properties:
required:
- '#power-domain-cells'
+ protocol@12:
+ $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node'
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ const: 0x12
+
protocol@13:
$ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node'
unevaluatedProperties: false
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-06-28 3:03 [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2024-07-01 17:04 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-07-04 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-08-09 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring (Arm) @ 2024-07-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: sudeep.holla, linux-kernel, conor+dt, devicetree,
cristian.marussi, krzk+dt, Peng Fan, arm-scmi, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:03:09 +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is 0x12.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-06-28 3:03 [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-01 17:04 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
@ 2024-07-04 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-07-04 10:46 ` Peng Fan
2024-08-09 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2024-07-04 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: cristian.marussi, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, linux-arm-kernel,
devicetree, linux-kernel, arm-scmi, Peng Fan
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is 0x12.
>
I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
other required property.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-07-04 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2024-07-04 10:46 ` Peng Fan
2024-07-18 12:15 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-07-04 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla, Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: cristian.marussi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is
> 0x12.
> >
>
> I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
> other required property.
I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And
Cristian gave some comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
i.MX95 no need dedicated channel for this node, but others may
have. So I repost this patch, and with this binding change,
the dtbs_check could pass for i.MX95 dts.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-07-04 10:46 ` Peng Fan
@ 2024-07-18 12:15 ` Peng Fan
2024-07-18 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-07-18 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan, Sudeep Holla, Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: cristian.marussi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
Hi Sudeep,
> Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> support
> > system power protocol
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is
> > 0x12.
> > >
> >
> > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
> > other required property.
>
> I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And Cristian
> gave some comments:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
>
Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.
Should I switch back to
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
or else?
Thanks,
Peng.
> i.MX95 no need dedicated channel for this node, but others may have.
> So I repost this patch, and with this binding change, the dtbs_check
> could pass for i.MX95 dts.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-07-18 12:15 ` Peng Fan
@ 2024-07-18 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-08-02 2:51 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2024-07-18 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan
Cc: Peng Fan (OSS), Sudeep Holla, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:15:20PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> > system power protocol
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> > support
> > > system power protocol
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is
> > > 0x12.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
> > > other required property.
> >
> > I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And Cristian
> > gave some comments:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> >
>
> Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.
>
> Should I switch back to
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> or else?
>
Sorry I need to discuss with Cristain and decide. I might have already
discussed but I can't recall the details or decision(if any) made after
that. He is away now, will get back once we discuss and see what is the
best approach.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-07-18 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2024-08-02 2:51 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-08-02 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla
Cc: Peng Fan (OSS), cristian.marussi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
Hi Sudeep, Cristian,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:15:20PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> support
> > > system power protocol
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> > > support
> > > > system power protocol
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id
> is
> > > > 0x12.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or
> > > > any other required property.
> > >
> > > I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And
> > > Cristian gave some comments:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > >
> >
> > Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.
> >
> > Should I switch back to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > or else?
> >
>
> Sorry I need to discuss with Cristain and decide. I might have already
> discussed but I can't recall the details or decision(if any) made after
> that. He is away now, will get back once we discuss and see what is the
> best approach.
>
Do you have any update on this?
Thanks,
Peng.
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
2024-06-28 3:03 [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-01 17:04 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-07-04 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2024-08-09 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2024-08-09 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cristian.marussi, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, Peng Fan (OSS)
Cc: Sudeep Holla, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, linux-kernel,
arm-scmi, Peng Fan
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:03:09 +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is 0x12.
>
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/updates), thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/4d5921a39f67
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-09 13:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-28 3:03 [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-07-01 17:04 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-07-04 10:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-07-04 10:46 ` Peng Fan
2024-07-18 12:15 ` Peng Fan
2024-07-18 14:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-08-02 2:51 ` Peng Fan
2024-08-09 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).