From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85F0194C83 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 13:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723210791; cv=none; b=nGgfvvNi7yZxmS1NdAqV9vBwL5Faj/+B93X9C6v4OlZ+NOKj5KJp+/4zR4CfSd0XrAnnwrbmNwVl1zy2FlaC2Xsg73gRiziLSUd8ZhsHhoAHjT8vfbfFvrXjnvJWrgmT/owxrDH4VOaWl1yo5EPkcr3X1kIi9Us8QblsVqlEvsA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723210791; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d0ADfooSD+MQ9RnlKIStCtMA/V5ID+/9Ydemptv/6kA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kQA5xAtJcf1pyaaub33nLG7pBfRILOfy1gLl0KbY6RfSZ3Yasyxbj9up57N0NM+OHGwQNviPmDsEWcTz3sjVzfOuCkEzZiOQ70l3u8yPCf0NOqxK9n4+4O/ZM4sh+gTwMzZSAA47RFRkmLLyGxuHDOpY2c/c/ZSsntLe2YaNQV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=EbwMsnsq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="EbwMsnsq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=d0AD fooSD+MQ9RnlKIStCtMA/V5ID+/9Ydemptv/6kA=; b=EbwMsnsqe5b601/dfoiH P0tRhsXZjJYY/U0XY23WsBZWDNxB5oCwjPor6GBrP0EFZhbVi9y39o38fNWgvCEV JGeCHNUMUxeRikLx6oYmeqJmHvzSo51Ul9GCkaKmvw/WOd3gSeaJQGowvvR+Bv2g gEHqTNWmQDRs47aWhBDsse+0hBHWOJ7xROtV1wAJwHx5z0zjBO5Tf29JoUioJbqs Il4gFalhFnOPp4WcJZb0rf2jQ6J87C2Vs2ZRaVByp0IkAdA3HNGoJctM09Q/m2Tv OGRw8iBE+en7oZfWB+i8DF1i3rCpJ8OYvWLD30S4kmmVqAIq6tVFTVqgKM+/AzKR bg== Received: (qmail 626016 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2024 15:39:47 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 9 Aug 2024 15:39:47 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@9knYRkAfRtsujnvj Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:39:46 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: claudiu beznea Cc: chris.brandt@renesas.com, andi.shyti@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, magnus.damm@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea , Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the R9A08G045 support Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , claudiu beznea , chris.brandt@renesas.com, andi.shyti@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, magnus.damm@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea , Conor Dooley References: <20240711115207.2843133-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> <20240711115207.2843133-8-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LKWSB06+yuFlnXKJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --LKWSB06+yuFlnXKJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I kept it like this to avoid confusion b/w RZ/G3S and RZ/V2H(P) documented > below, as the RZ/G3S falls back to renesas,riic-r9a09g057 (RZ/V2H(P)). >=20 > I can add a comment here, too, if you still consider necessary. Please let > me know. I see. I don't know how such fallbacks are documented usually, so I won't consider it necessary. I was just wondering about it. Let's just be consistent with previous fallbacks, however they were handled. --LKWSB06+yuFlnXKJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAma2HCIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbWeBAAhwySOswgim7RXFC0+wmYWTWMPQ//dQm/h/4zKInQ4cqR/IVJjo1qA0gq iIgmtyf0AUdG0TbPLGvRBtobSYulS9OTocCsLUAgO5qGNVYfptBkhl++JDC3ZKG2 RRHJA9fsdGFuoLrN7BeADFXtC84VYvBFHoOoOUX9TV+qPU6WYk6ReVW7HllVaOr8 mzuq/PGSQ2xieUpFj9lUdYu48WCkUQFBJu5/Cjas6NcHxKzyPbrsb5kFllXix+CN Yi8/w1+Q8uZnYC20uH2G7f0xamWvvAq7b34KJbLW5+xE1E0BVBO5xYUTZd8PtZZG vgTIDK0Qp0GM+afklmbLdVTrW0yn5YTQF8hWerjln2e2dW4KCK5zN9Ybw8ZYpcQw iOuKGt7CMDsEd/Dx/uNsrrOV9v5DxFkDrZC7bGoYtmo1C3bPlRUPziO7KXSzkwZ6 6gSUFT+Df13pdXe4hUbtF2An20ytN+RxJtOvz3NrLlt6rv0R6aNE91Y0r0UJooUT VliQCQlkw5ncYUMy9EJG78SAPTqGPF4NQUxvou+VEnMeeVF4k98QET5zsvX0DoSq 5z3lARzdrnwxPrxooHhT6LMH+p6bd77LD/CO5NxVtYeofOjFffSPESRIKpIBnKup d9dP5viQ/hMi80xCNQe97gHhkVbJpvJSAwHmuYIffIsMl3tw44s= =fyRb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LKWSB06+yuFlnXKJ--