From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C811922DD; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724165298; cv=none; b=f4FLEzMjBaJKh8Pv/WInIpB0WoeG4BVXVg5kfcU20aLDuK/XPgdd4y9gLcKjM4ZXNWgX+jfcpXfSqW/w5Dm6Am8nK8bZmi9RI+6ZmlvwTbY6UZwSk9yDIwBvuBbjv+7FLhRhpliOGkqIgmSFD6Gc+LdauA+Y7dnWMyJjgIJKd2E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724165298; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tb22dduees/8qZVbHW/1yyoCMCxgQQcl+0y4YdF4B+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hKP0tpMyt8mKYCMefpoQJa92YcDaP76Z7MzcplgK1/zF2h7/cGnZQQtNmKp14dcAVyIfz55ten8yl3pMZ21XQg58Pc5oPH7CjCPTYicnkiHoWShwVIxjjVirhthXIYHL6aQObbm6oYl0aYpp6VEqReopYzNM1E2GjoRUXx0Y3xQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39577DA7; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.198.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A98113F66E; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:48:11 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla , souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Use max_msg and max_msg_size from devicetree Message-ID: References: <20240730144707.1647025-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20240730144707.1647025-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240730144707.1647025-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:47:06PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Override max_msg and max_msg_size transport properties when corresponding > devicetree properties are available. > I am holding off on these changes to think how these max_msg and max_msg_size can be used without breaking any platforms allowing space for the header and the message itself which is around 28 bytes. The binding itself looks good. We may have to adjust the value passed to the core driver taking the above into consideration. -- Regards, Sudeep