From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:01:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsdE0PxKnGRjzChl@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822092006.3134096-7-wenst@chromium.org>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
>
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
>
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
>
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.
...
> --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ i2c-core-objs := i2c-core-base.o i2c-core-smbus.o
> i2c-core-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += i2c-core-acpi.o
> i2c-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) += i2c-core-slave.o
> i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) += i2c-core-of.o
> +i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) += i2c-core-of-prober.o
Seems like all the above (except ACPI) have the same issue, i.e. TABs/spaces
mixture.
...
> + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs);
> + if (!ret) {
Why not positive conditional?
> + /*
> + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to
> + * exist as long as the change is applied.
> + */
> + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs);
> + } else {
> + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */
> + of_changeset_destroy(ocs);
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 9:19 [PATCH v5 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 12:32 ` Rob Herring
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 13:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 6:49 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-23 13:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-26 6:46 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-26 12:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-26 12:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-26 13:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] regulator: Split up _regulator_get() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 6:54 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] regulator: Do pure DT regulator lookup in of_regulator_bulk_get_all() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 7:05 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] gpiolib: Add gpio_property_name_length() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 14:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 7:50 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-23 13:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 14:01 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-08-23 8:40 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-23 13:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-22 9:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] i2c: of-prober: Add regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 14:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 9:35 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-23 13:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-22 9:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 14:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-23 10:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-23 14:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-26 7:21 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 9:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-08-22 9:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsdE0PxKnGRjzChl@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).