From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006E1185947 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725278677; cv=none; b=W6iVD15LUBSPHhpMbGhk2/bb5W6hrpCzKG7A0iCChZW1Tq3c5BXKN58oetOxhZ4vQPlryElBrSQkXZPlbvc3QbaGDCfyk3a8mfdHo4zxLc2ZtQDkDm3SXrIW+1qTVnxFppeyKgaO8wqEdekvfG93rAXrY20XYxus+k/zK3qz5nE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725278677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lox6fW5epfgn4FAPDOXF3hh8zz8KYkeL5GbkYrNl10o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G1RAaBmexU2oGwVr0W220ktPwH0T1KsZUyU9rizCOes68eimVs8nDHKofMOSpvv7vniazvwYFK7fYCOXVTMOe+ShJEfn4eb3JZZkAQS524ulbQc6C7C6Q+S1xW/QGBs5Nd//glgLJGP7d4JOgYeC2MLRaxPcQKF7VoFNrZHvQ50= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=U24EiZf+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="U24EiZf+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=aTPi xh1xqAuaI+tu+rlRAeX8nd6PO5C2gotdlBn4iT8=; b=U24EiZf+33S03r//eLXC 9WDpGH4/MzYRxw9xfHW7IZgeIwCrr+GSjZGrEouBaCSRx/2+Nc6dPxXmdRZMvtok gyv5Xg+Eq78PXW1QQaESLx2xp1zsGqOYrOnVQeji5CsKK4sSBL15j9tWsjfO4DO8 +nK+kJ1I77mfL3jljszVHw9s9jSA4pD2e/vkyF3wfIliWYOZDyQ9cKJyuT2kxncR d890AHX/fDu6imZVLTNWzYhuyfR5lSEKZs62/0GaqmqNhaY6yAWRE3Nwo5DRbdwW zcB+kXVoBSRHgu9w6kMHv9SxZoCjFKBuCtfjog698+WBSRT+yI5ZYUhPUlbXAfmt rQ== Received: (qmail 4102460 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2024 14:04:29 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 2 Sep 2024 14:04:29 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@eLc2viEhEt4gAwDPXwdRANgvu6DX4+2c Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:04:29 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Magnus Damm , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,rcar-i2c: document SMBusAlert usage Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Magnus Damm , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20240826150840.25497-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20240826150840.25497-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5ak5lBGLc+wP53ZB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --5ak5lBGLc+wP53ZB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Still, this interrupt is not a property of the R-Car i2C hardware block, > so it should not be modelled as such. Hmm, you are probably right, given that I need this in the board DTS: === &i2c3 { pinctrl-0 = <&i2c3_pins>; pinctrl-names = "i2c-pwr"; + + /delete-property/ interrupts; + interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_SPI 290 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <&gpio1 26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; + interrupt-names = "main", "smbus_alert"; + + smbus; }; === I have to admit this is not exactly pretty. Pity, though, the I2C core is all prepared for the above. Seems I have to update the core for "alert-gpios", after all. Happy hacking, Wolfram --5ak5lBGLc+wP53ZB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmbVqckACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZ4FQ/9F1MSfeHT1DMYXHo+XVIYSf0S4IDfPo5hWKb4vn4n18ZyN2rOoGkJT/ak 0YqkK8UBtRaypQ0hcV5HoNmniZloNw7lezyiAJRLa5fzhNw34yQxjqISTizcB42u e77c0KFh3s8ILvU34zBCDG/PQzEAZOIfUH8BChwDFdKOWORofdEMkdui8zrBe/of bGjP/DVJnzA1cYYJMAirY2HUjbWasttHY7hnjtJyaGvlCuyuk8I7JDu3LXIkK9wH 3X42WUatkdmmegqddqaknCZszNMRly0jJV/Uhy/FHSSANaSR2MqW14IoEDIcwa+D ebcNLENqYzed/jwPOS5j7SmnjJ7fQlKvh+cCH8Gi4apR+ovAvig0kDiTLp9ZCYib gsRBnXvcINk5TlHNJT6l7V64j+UiTeSlkAHxUu6PFdboYqs9De7OY7vO5ZmljVpF Zba7IoXMqgps1QOluwCBKAUVnanAMuFd890swfDPWMHAqxmQg5Kw3uxeOaWqJ6Eq zFpqxojviNfFhunQLYLeZOH3tfAdK/iEdP2YOvJxuSKMjjnoc9gmm30sCIfCTjAj LwB8D90RD4zLAOPOKn8zQg1y9vyDZk/TwJms8XAWP492upau2lHqMAjtmOUgZqAk CbtCwewt55n1LD5bzDFnslUZF2vQmjjma2OAL9seRLZvep4nxc8= =E0V2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5ak5lBGLc+wP53ZB--