From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538D2193073; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726063046; cv=none; b=jzdwzClHEY+VQSDOXK8XklvbC8j8OVm5ElO66EM5dLUtLuabq4wZJu0BT75syXi0dSsYuOPfX0pM/EzwPHtOoVUVfqRZFBOStsyMzDokiKlVu0DrnprqswgHKWLNitXkvgZ1ZYwT+gbuJjYEWWAxVD8KPOeIQjS5fBzn/auqQdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726063046; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wImPhwLYU/yulcxrj5+8ZyqsYcLtMANEgV3hK2znSPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PV1kmHuGojcCWBkA7F/PRxZOSEQDqkysVTM1/h5RQmJ+1aL+aZROI6XoV0DPACPVSHcIlMX8HhV64fu2XQCFw4c392CZIwhs884yNYfSbx3DPKX0HSPDDkEImRHnfhZ8to7W1Mc1OzP2O3dVLkAW8N5xmdl2FB3Gd4Saa1G1LIA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UD+JfgpX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UD+JfgpX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB085C4CEC0; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:57:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726063044; bh=wImPhwLYU/yulcxrj5+8ZyqsYcLtMANEgV3hK2znSPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UD+JfgpXDztEgCkJASvgkXlKDpBY7O/zUfiXxQjWF5fesIf2oRxejlq0sVkdJ/T2x EOZlP00Mq8EBL+Z9Cnu3ngPOudndqugnFpz/mgcE85GiDC70dQgI4H9z8XzAVQ4wgE cABE/HrI3TgmjGfPfxheihxIteQaeQ8x21j0HtViYYCUV0+1GVwtyX+oKA942zz/0b xO1R/Lo+/AvifHzVLKbqCbT+76tEdh7ZHnXLCkPU07gWkYR0yRJd5XjVLsFaeY0IIf SX8Gc6qCyKxbcJgqQVfubgWQrSbym/ZM/N4n7680FQe31CdVCIAO7odZxkYIU7m9N0 zqe6l5vJuVeIw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1soNqo-000000006KZ-2LiB; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:57:43 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:57:42 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Abel Vesa , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'vddpe-3v3-supply' again Message-ID: References: <20240911135106.GA629136@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240911135106.GA629136@bhelgaas> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 05:13:28PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > Commit 756485bfbb85 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,pcie-sc7280: Move SC7280 to > > > dedicated schema") incorrectly removed 'vddpe-3v3-supply' from the > > > bindings, which results in DT checker warnings like: > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-dora.dtb: pcie@600000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('vddpe-3v3-supply' was unexpected) > > > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml# > > > > > > Note that this property has been part of the Qualcomm PCIe bindings > > > since 2018 and would need to be deprecated rather than simply removed if > > > there is a desire to replace it with 'vpcie3v3' which is used for some > > > non-Qualcomm controllers. > > > > > > Fixes: 756485bfbb85 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,pcie-sc7280: Move SC7280 to dedicated schema") > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold > > > > Can someone pick this one up for 6.11? > > I applied this to pci/dt-bindings for v6.12. > > v6.11 is possible but we'd need a bit of a story to justify it. > 756485bfbb85 appeared in v6.9, and the commit log says it fixes a DT > checker warning, which don't make it sound like this is urgent. Is > there more to it that would make this v6.11 material? No, merging for 6.12 is fine (e.g. this late in the cycle). Thanks. Johan