From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:25:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuQTFTNTBLCziD05@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911072751.365361-7-wenst@chromium.org>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
>
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
>
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
>
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.
...
> +static int i2c_of_probe_enable_node(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + dev_info(dev, "Enabling %pOF\n", node);
Is it important to be on INFO level?
> + struct of_changeset *ocs __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*ocs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ocs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + of_changeset_init(ocs);
> + ret = of_changeset_update_prop_string(ocs, node, "status", "okay");
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */
> + of_changeset_destroy(ocs);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to
> + * exist as long as the change is applied.
> + */
> + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
...
> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx)
> +{
> + const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> + const char *type;
> + struct device_node *i2c_node;
> + struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!cfg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ops = cfg->ops ?: &i2c_of_probe_dummy_ops;
> + type = cfg->type;
> +
> + i2c_node = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type);
struct device_node *i2c_node __free(of_node_put) =
i2c_...;
> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_node))
> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_node);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> + if (!of_device_is_available(node))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the
> + * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once.
> + */
> + ret = 0;
Shouldn't you drop reference count for "node"? (See also below)
> + goto out_put_i2c_node;
> + }
> +
> + i2c = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(i2c_node);
> + if (!i2c) {
> + ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "Couldn't get I2C adapter\n");
> + goto out_put_i2c_node;
> + }
> +
> + /* Grab resources */
> + ret = 0;
> + if (ops->get_resources)
> + ret = ops->get_resources(dev, i2c_node, ctx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_put_i2c_adapter;
> +
> + /* Enable resources */
> + if (ops->enable)
> + ret = ops->enable(dev, ctx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_release_resources;
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> + union i2c_smbus_data data;
> + u32 addr;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr))
> + continue;
> + if (i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c, addr, 0, I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &data) < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Found a device that is responding */
> + if (ops->free_resources_early)
> + ops->free_resources_early(ctx);
> + ret = i2c_of_probe_enable_node(dev, node);
Hmm... Is "node" reference count left bumped up for a reason?
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ops->cleanup)
> + ops->cleanup(dev, ctx);
> +out_release_resources:
> + if (ops->free_resources_late)
> + ops->free_resources_late(ctx);
> +out_put_i2c_adapter:
> + i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
> +out_put_i2c_node:
> + of_node_put(i2c_node);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
...
> +/*
> + * i2c-of-prober.h - definitions for the Linux I2C OF component prober
Please avoid putting filenames inside files. In the possible future event of
file renaming this may become a burden and sometimes even forgotten.
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Google LLC
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H
> +#define _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)
Do you really need to hide data types with this? Wouldn't be enough to hide
APIs only?
> +struct device;
> +struct device_node;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_ops - I2C OF component prober callbacks
> + *
> + * A set of callbacks to be used by i2c_of_probe_component().
> + *
> + * All callbacks are optional. Callbacks are called only once per run, and are
> + * used in the order they are defined in this structure.
> + *
> + * All callbacks that have return values shall return %0 on success,
> + * or a negative error number on failure.
> + *
> + * The @dev parameter passed to the callbacks is the same as @dev passed to
> + * i2c_of_probe_component(). It should only be used for dev_printk() calls
> + * and nothing else, especially not managed device resource (devres) APIs.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_ops {
> + /** @get_resources: Retrieve resources for components. */
> + int (*get_resources)(struct device *dev, struct device_node *bus_node, void *data);
> +
> + /** @free_resources_early: Release exclusive resources prior to enabling component. */
> + void (*free_resources_early)(void *data);
> +
> + /**
> + * @enable: Enable resources so that the components respond to probes.
> + *
> + * Resources should be reverted to their initial state before returning if this fails.
> + */
> + int (*enable)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +
> + /**
> + * @cleanup: Opposite of @enable to balance refcounts after probing.
> + *
> + * Can not operate on resources already freed in @free_resources_early.
> + */
> + int (*cleanup)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +
> + /**
> + * @free_resources_late: Release all resources, including those that would have
> + * been released by @free_resources_early.
> + */
> + void (*free_resources_late)(void *data);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_cfg - I2C OF component prober configuration
> + * @ops: Callbacks for the prober to use.
> + * @type: A string to match the device node name prefix to probe for.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_cfg {
> + const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> + const char *type;
> +};
> +
> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx);
> +
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H */
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 7:27 [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-12 20:31 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] regulator: Split up _regulator_get() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] regulator: Add of_regulator_get_optional() for pure DT regulator lookup Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] i2c: core: Remove extra space in Makefile Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 14:59 ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:25 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-09-15 10:44 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-16 10:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-16 14:59 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15 11:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 14:15 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:31 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-15 10:09 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-17 12:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-23 19:11 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15 9:46 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 23:43 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:58 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 18:08 ` (subset) [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuQTFTNTBLCziD05@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).