devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Wu <michael.wu@kneron.us>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Morgan Chang <morgan.chang@kneron.us>,
	mvp.kutali@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: dwsignware: determine HS tHIGH and tLOW based on HW parameters
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:44:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvZ-b_JRVnsh9o_8@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927042230.277144-3-michael.wu@kneron.us>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:22:17PM +0800, Michael Wu wrote:
> In commit 35eba185fd1a ("i2c: designware: Calculate SCL timing parameter
> for High Speed Mode") hs_hcnt and hs_lcnt are calculated based on fixed
> tHIGH = 160 and tLOW = 120. However, the set of these fixed values only
> applies to the combination of hardware parameters IC_CAP_LOADING = 400pF
> and IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 1. Outside of this combination, if these
> fixed tHIGH = 160 and tLOW = 120 are still used, the calculated hs_hcnt
> and hs_lcnt may not be small enough, making it impossible for the SCL
> frequency to reach 3.4 MHz.
> 
> Section 3.15.4.5 in DesignWare DW_apb_i2b Databook v2.03 says that when
> IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 0,
> 
>     MIN_SCL_HIGHtime = 60 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> 		     = 120 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
>     MIN_SCL_LOWtime = 160 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> 		    = 320 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
> 
> and section 3.15.4.6 says that when IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 1,
> 
>     MIN_SCL_HIGHtime = 60 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> 		     = 160 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
>     MIN_SCL_LOWtime = 120 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> 		    = 320 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
> 
> In order to calculate more accurate hs_hcnt amd hs_lcnt, two hardware
> parameters IC_CAP_LOADING and IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION must be
> considered together.

...

> +static void i2c_dw_fw_parse_hw_params(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)

Separate function is an overkill. Just inline its contents...

...

> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(device, "bus-capacitance-pf", &dev->bus_capacitance_pf);
> +	if (ret || dev->bus_capacitance_pf < 400)
> +		dev->bus_capacitance_pf = 100;
> +	else
> +		dev->bus_capacitance_pf = 400;
> +
> +	dev->clk_freq_optimized = device_property_read_bool(device, "clk-freq-optimized");

...

>  	i2c_parse_fw_timings(device, t, false);
>  
> +	i2c_dw_fw_parse_hw_params(dev);

...here.

>  	i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(dev);

...

> + * @bus_capacitance_pf: bus capacitance in picofarad

picofarads

...

> +			u32 t_high, t_low;
> +
> +			if (dev->bus_capacitance_pf == 400) {
> +				t_high = dev->clk_freq_optimized ? 160 : 120;
> +				t_low = 320;
> +			} else {

Yeah, this has no protection against wrong values in the DT/ACPI.
So, perhaps

			} else if (...) {

and assign defaults or bail out with an error?

> +				t_high = 60;
> +				t_low = dev->clk_freq_optimized ? 120 : 160;
> +			}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-27  4:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] Compute HS HCNT and LCNT based on HW parameters Michael Wu
2024-09-27  4:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: snps,designware-i2c: add bus-capacitance-pf and clk-freq-optimized Michael Wu
2024-09-27  8:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-28  7:07     ` Michael Wu
2024-09-27  4:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: dwsignware: determine HS tHIGH and tLOW based on HW parameters Michael Wu
2024-09-27  8:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27  9:44   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZvZ-b_JRVnsh9o_8@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.wu@kneron.us \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=morgan.chang@kneron.us \
    --cc=mvp.kutali@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).