From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Wu <michael.wu@kneron.us>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Morgan Chang <morgan.chang@kneron.us>,
mvp.kutali@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: dwsignware: determine HS tHIGH and tLOW based on HW parameters
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:44:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvZ-b_JRVnsh9o_8@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927042230.277144-3-michael.wu@kneron.us>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:22:17PM +0800, Michael Wu wrote:
> In commit 35eba185fd1a ("i2c: designware: Calculate SCL timing parameter
> for High Speed Mode") hs_hcnt and hs_lcnt are calculated based on fixed
> tHIGH = 160 and tLOW = 120. However, the set of these fixed values only
> applies to the combination of hardware parameters IC_CAP_LOADING = 400pF
> and IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 1. Outside of this combination, if these
> fixed tHIGH = 160 and tLOW = 120 are still used, the calculated hs_hcnt
> and hs_lcnt may not be small enough, making it impossible for the SCL
> frequency to reach 3.4 MHz.
>
> Section 3.15.4.5 in DesignWare DW_apb_i2b Databook v2.03 says that when
> IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 0,
>
> MIN_SCL_HIGHtime = 60 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> = 120 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
> MIN_SCL_LOWtime = 160 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> = 320 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
>
> and section 3.15.4.6 says that when IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION = 1,
>
> MIN_SCL_HIGHtime = 60 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> = 160 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
> MIN_SCL_LOWtime = 120 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 100pF
> = 320 ns for 3.4 Mbps, bus loading = 400pF
>
> In order to calculate more accurate hs_hcnt amd hs_lcnt, two hardware
> parameters IC_CAP_LOADING and IC_CLK_FREQ_OPTIMIZATION must be
> considered together.
...
> +static void i2c_dw_fw_parse_hw_params(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
Separate function is an overkill. Just inline its contents...
...
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(device, "bus-capacitance-pf", &dev->bus_capacitance_pf);
> + if (ret || dev->bus_capacitance_pf < 400)
> + dev->bus_capacitance_pf = 100;
> + else
> + dev->bus_capacitance_pf = 400;
> +
> + dev->clk_freq_optimized = device_property_read_bool(device, "clk-freq-optimized");
...
> i2c_parse_fw_timings(device, t, false);
>
> + i2c_dw_fw_parse_hw_params(dev);
...here.
> i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(dev);
...
> + * @bus_capacitance_pf: bus capacitance in picofarad
picofarads
...
> + u32 t_high, t_low;
> +
> + if (dev->bus_capacitance_pf == 400) {
> + t_high = dev->clk_freq_optimized ? 160 : 120;
> + t_low = 320;
> + } else {
Yeah, this has no protection against wrong values in the DT/ACPI.
So, perhaps
} else if (...) {
and assign defaults or bail out with an error?
> + t_high = 60;
> + t_low = dev->clk_freq_optimized ? 120 : 160;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 4:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] Compute HS HCNT and LCNT based on HW parameters Michael Wu
2024-09-27 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: snps,designware-i2c: add bus-capacitance-pf and clk-freq-optimized Michael Wu
2024-09-27 8:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-28 7:07 ` Michael Wu
2024-09-27 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: dwsignware: determine HS tHIGH and tLOW based on HW parameters Michael Wu
2024-09-27 8:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 9:44 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvZ-b_JRVnsh9o_8@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.wu@kneron.us \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=morgan.chang@kneron.us \
--cc=mvp.kutali@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).