From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491F01E48A; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728456566; cv=none; b=FVjnyZDuVV0KdljXejIYyEoxDSm6aN3999DmOJpPeP1y/aCmHAaOrx7GYXDC7dDumJrzkLHCrkaGaDrgzcTX1KgNhTFKSD8Giq2LNg1vejYYKz80NYTtJV7QzvORa8O4mK/Chuxcf0EZoqUSJ52sWBywg9gOI0S5LG59owdFjNc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728456566; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K0wTO0P+SD9WkcMo9G1S7p8QWIzc7QXT/iG62OpJhNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z/lKu0M3e/Y5uHAnTOHht97Bp6OsRpmY11MBhu1ovd7FUg/GQ+Div621tF4S0idev3RrVgIdvVMhh29upnwcRT+bN8IQUsnowCTwSqUYacd3hP5ykIIorN7QyOlq/krkiSl7kLxM0Uj/dgS97k2lQI188IXUn5BEqpaGC5Ba5io= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EzRSu0vE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EzRSu0vE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E334AC4CEC5; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:49:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728456565; bh=K0wTO0P+SD9WkcMo9G1S7p8QWIzc7QXT/iG62OpJhNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EzRSu0vEscb8ZJFUNuun1/g+fZpuervnioQ8kBCYnbCnuVaiC5lMSz5ZZ405dKTzL 2anW7T22mpiv2LgKxO2h87p7mQ4k9+l3bW4Brr3n1+ILh/r1TVy5wnrJNNsCL1kC6W L3ESbwswHBdmfukSuOdubveoypWt6SEafr0bNJV1rNj37ADP/MJ8fjxtLMigyfvt3r oPY7X+KKCAUe0f1TvAg0eTgvju3cW0390HE+BxNXD+UwGDJOaTFukxoi6j4IwHUdPp S8FfU3H85hlZjbfs2eh3n4byYXllLXGc/1S4ZKFItFF2MAbKEvIFvyFFyzCi22H5bT UX/hl4CYcs82g== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:49:23 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Xu Yang Cc: Frank.li@nxp.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com, james.clark@linaro.org, mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linux.dev, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf vendor events arm64: Add i.MX91 DDR Performance Monitor metrics Message-ID: References: <20240924061251.3387850-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com> <20240924061251.3387850-3-xu.yang_2@nxp.com> <20241008054935.zi2kqcaj4fwf2bda@hippo> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241008054935.zi2kqcaj4fwf2bda@hippo> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:49:35PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:07:51PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > > Add JSON metrics for i.MX91 DDR Performance Monitor. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang > > > --- > > > .../arch/arm64/freescale/imx91/sys/ddrc.json | 9 +++++++ > > > .../arm64/freescale/imx91/sys/metrics.json | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/freescale/imx91/sys/ddrc.json > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/freescale/imx91/sys/metrics.json > > > > How do you want to route this? As it's mixed with kernel changes, I > > would generally request to split but it's a change just to add new > > files so it should be ok to go with other tree. In that case, > > Sorry for late. > > How about you pick up this one to perf-tools tree and Will Deacon pick up > the first 2 patches to his tree? I didn't see Will apply perf-tools patch > before. Did Will pick up the kernel patches already? Thanks, Namhyung