From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Karumanchi, Vineeth" <vineeth@amd.com>
Cc: vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
git@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: macb: Configure High Speed Mac for given speed.
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:17:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zwfh-ZJB4BtnJY28@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fc42ade-66cf-4462-914c-3dd5589c9a9f@amd.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 07:39:16PM +0530, Karumanchi, Vineeth wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
> On 10/9/2024 2:49 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > It also looks like you're messing with MAC registers in the PCS code,
> > setting the MAC speed there. Are the PCS and MAC so integrated together
> > that abstracting the PCS into its own separate code block leads to
> > problems?
>
> Agreed, Since our current hardware configuration lacks AN and PHY, I've
> relocated the ENABLE_HS_MAC configuration into PCS to
> allow speed changes using ethtool. When more hardware with a PHY that
> supports AN becomes available,
> the phylink will invoke macb_mac_config() with the communicated speed
> (phylinkstate->speed).
Where are you getting that idea from, because that has not been true for
a good number of years - and it's been stated in the phylink
documentation for a very long time.
I've killed all the code references to ->speed in all mac_config()
implementations, and I've even gone to the extent of now ensuring that
all mac_config() methods will _always_ be called with state->speed
set to SPEED_UNKNOWN, so no one can make any useful determinations
from that.
If people continue to insist on using this, then I'll have no option
but to make a disruptive API change, making mac_config() take an
explicit set of arguments for the items that it should have access
to.
> Currently, for fixed-link, will keep the earlier implementation.
I want phylink users to be correct and easy to understand - because
I maintain phylink, and that means I need to understand the code
that makes use of its facilities. So, want to see phylink methods
implemented properly. If they aren't going to be implemented
properly, then I will ask that the driver ceases to use phylink
quite simply because it makes _my_ maintenance more difficult
when drivers don't implement phylink methods correctly.
The choice is: implement phylink methods properly or don't use
phylink.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 5:39 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] net: macb: Add versal2 10GBE device support Vineeth Karumanchi
2024-10-09 5:39 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] dt-bindings: net: macb: Add support for versal2 10gbe device Vineeth Karumanchi
2024-10-09 6:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-09 5:39 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: macb: Add versal2 10GBE device support Vineeth Karumanchi
2024-10-09 5:39 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] net: macb: Update USX_CONTROL reg's bitfields and constants Vineeth Karumanchi
2024-10-09 9:04 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-09 5:39 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: macb: Configure High Speed Mac for given speed Vineeth Karumanchi
2024-10-09 6:36 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-10 13:53 ` Karumanchi, Vineeth
2024-10-09 9:19 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-10 14:09 ` Karumanchi, Vineeth
2024-10-10 14:17 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-10-09 5:39 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] net: macb: Get speed and link status runtime Vineeth Karumanchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zwfh-ZJB4BtnJY28@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=git@amd.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com \
--cc=vineeth@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).