From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA551DE8A4 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729179743; cv=none; b=b7BZancYDCFnnaW6wGBiafE5e3OE/H2eag54xAjA1+ypTgWs+abwhsAyhqiT9t2j43AlOcAO6zds1qEYVxBojrU5RmB1ERT70G9+IIrIP0TC2dedXDj3O5xGSTnJDb/rVckK+rfQT11jvJZjbgVjoJ7QTv42xs4k9eE/gLuOOMc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729179743; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q5AtdPEm1PuN3XeHZLXsinD5ecrZzps7l04Ib81p5f0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=thIRorI87gC6OEA3BgK6d561G+837bWbtEtDVwrAn+v6AUYrvJeC9tDTVoRRVGRjVO0fKxebcr2ls31XHSEghnexTaAJVCgCwSD15K9DMlbxkDXL44rjehTld/n+6Xpyanr7bOYresPzvFDaamLTBaz27WGEhMjc8+oT4EQr6n8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Rc7X5/7r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Rc7X5/7r" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1729179740; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V7nlaMmwkDWBlLKSYgZgz6rCQ7wh+bD5wdO571q/O5s=; b=Rc7X5/7rwz/+iPUT2zios+TWYNfn4va16n0+AUUqxIB+L7ojoYaB1p7R264k9bSH0CvvSR bgq40Cn68Ni5EKGBX3waAGzfuKxmFXyhTA3S0E5sO8RWRu2xxmDh5+EZdrbBrEIYV3m0o+ d8HXqumrrrRd84Krd0iIvehEwyL5BJ8= Received: from mail-oa1-f71.google.com (mail-oa1-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-81--5xogkFLM_2h41tmP-zI-w-1; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:42:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -5xogkFLM_2h41tmP-zI-w-1 Received: by mail-oa1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2886d7f00f4so1277214fac.3 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729179739; x=1729784539; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V7nlaMmwkDWBlLKSYgZgz6rCQ7wh+bD5wdO571q/O5s=; b=SunnY9sbWXBHW9aPVEXrOWXJYFv2rnzOY1pcCKH3hXKzi8UykbSmzUkwtuzDEuMID3 h0PUphziuZFCQEDaIHsyzaV6C0khPcALMq5hqdSC8qkr7mB/JNeBq5/xqV5Y1saERzmS MebQVLTTqL4WdqkQ+XTuVO0rDRVUGUPsh5PtvNb47dDk/gygnorSGF5AquULXqYQ8Rf2 Q+xEdujUbA5cErsl4AZDbpyonPD/KokKcOt7SuYpsit5mN03wRWmpLU3xdzw3hvXE5jD +PKB5+u5WbEO8i5S/FdMAXAWAsPybp5cc25Dv3T5hUXqVVk1qAiYkquR8etlC2aSpmhZ Wn+g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXFrEKmXriEkBXebvzjdskWZ7+6y3VnsPucqEzfjXH+fF0K2HjRR+6iVcKgUmTGk/Z3IjwHHTgSuE5u@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0Teh2dXqrmeLwkUz0bLmxZ+4no2uepG4jJp68ZXAP0bBXKVm9 bWCHd/wSCF8ihwvNhJiQ9k6FuxIizzDU+tksGjHY8lWJB67b9LOgklkLqeKcwhEIdoy16cFxFuK GaVGdID02A9L+igZFy8ZRAFbQaKfWAzKfnMM/7KTuMM18zntuovfIyMpwcaA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4691:b0:287:3fa2:8978 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2886de2fa6dmr17557329fac.27.1729179739053; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHTiDT+m1aEWffgqxEy8Wl41c5Qgk4pCN7PTXVak99nDs/BXI21P+GiCClP6rUO/EGE5gecg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4691:b0:287:3fa2:8978 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2886de2fa6dmr17557306fac.27.1729179738733; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1 ([2600:381:fc16:a0d2:12c4:d014:b458:d7ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 586e51a60fabf-288dac77a49sm1383337fac.29.2024.10.17.08.42.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:42:13 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Jagadeesh Kona Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ajit Pandey , Imran Shaik , Taniya Das , Satya Priya Kakitapalli , Shivnandan Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add CPU OPP tables to scale DDR/L3 Message-ID: References: <20241017-sa8775p-cpufreq-l3-ddr-scaling-v1-0-074e0fb80b33@quicinc.com> <20241017-sa8775p-cpufreq-l3-ddr-scaling-v1-2-074e0fb80b33@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241017-sa8775p-cpufreq-l3-ddr-scaling-v1-2-074e0fb80b33@quicinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:58:31PM +0530, Jagadeesh Kona wrote: > + cpu0_opp_table: opp-table-cpu0 { > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > + opp-shared; > + > + cpu0_opp_1267mhz: opp-1267200000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1267200000>; > + opp-peak-kBps = <6220800 29491200>; > + }; > + > + cpu0_opp_1363mhz: opp-1363200000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1363200000>; > + opp-peak-kBps = <6220800 29491200>; > + }; [snip] > + cpu4_opp_table: opp-table-cpu4 { > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > + opp-shared; > + > + cpu4_opp_1267mhz: opp-1267200000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1267200000>; > + opp-peak-kBps = <6220800 29491200>; > + }; > + > + cpu4_opp_1363mhz: opp-1363200000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1363200000>; > + opp-peak-kBps = <6220800 29491200>; > + }; There's no functional differences in the cpu0 and cpu4 opp tables. Can a single table be used? This aligns with my recollection that this particular SoC only has the gold cores. Brian