From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ryder.lee@mediatek.com,
jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
nbd@nbd.name, dd@embedd.com, upstream@airoha.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add Airoha EN7581 support
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 08:39:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zyxuv-2SPuEXiL5R@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106233123.GA1580663@bhelgaas>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6387 bytes --]
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 11:40:28PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > Introduce support for Airoha EN7581 PCIe controller to mediatek-gen3
> > > > PCIe controller driver.
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > > +static int mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > > > + int err;
> > > > + u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk assert in
> > > > + * mtk_pcie_setup for EN7581 SoC.
> > > > + */
> > > > + mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS);
> >
> > > It looks wrong to me to do the assert and deassert in different
> > > places:
> > >
> > > mtk_pcie_setup
> > > reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->phy_resets) <--
> > > mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up
> > > mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
> > > reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->phy_resets) <--
> > > mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
> > >
> > > That makes the code hard to understand.
> >
> > The phy reset line was already asserted running reset_control_assert() in
> > mtk_pcie_setup() and de-asserted running reset_control_deassert() in
> > mtk_pcie_power_up() before adding EN7581 support. Moreover, EN7581 requires
> > to run phy_init()/phy_power_on() before de-asserting the phy reset lines.
> > I guess I can add a comment to make it more clear. Agree?
>
> I assume the first deassert(phy_resets) in mtk_pcie_setup() is not
> paired with anything in this driver.
correct
>
> I think it would be better to pair the other assert/deasserts in the
> same functions like the below. Then it's easy to see the matching.
ack, I will post a fix for it
>
> While looking at this, I noticed that we assert(mac_reset) in
> mtk_pcie_setup(), but it's never deasserted for EN7581.
ack, I will post a fix for it
>
> mtk_pcie_setup
> reset_control_bulk_deassert(phy_resets)
> mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up
> reset_control_bulk_assert(phy_resets) # move here
> reset_control_assert(mac_reset) # move here
> mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
> phy_init
> phy_power_on
> reset_control_deassert(mac_reset) # add; seems missing?
> reset_control_bulk_deassert(phy_resets)
> mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
>
> mtk_pcie_setup
> reset_control_bulk_deassert(phy_resets)
> mtk_pcie_power_up
> reset_control_bulk_assert(phy_resets) # move here
> reset_control_assert(mac_reset) # move here
> reset_control_bulk_deassert(phy_resets)
> phy_init
> phy_power_on
> reset_control_deassert(mac_reset)
>
> > > > + err = phy_init(pcie->phy);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize PHY\n");
> > > > + return err;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + err = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to power on PHY\n");
> > > > + goto err_phy_on;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets, pcie->phy_resets);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to deassert PHYs\n");
> > > > + goto err_phy_deassert;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk de-assert above.
> > > > + * This time is specific for EN7581 SoC.
> > > > + */
> > > > + mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS);
> > > > +
> > > > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > > > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > > + err = clk_bulk_prepare(pcie->num_clks, pcie->clks);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare clock\n");
> > > > + goto err_clk_prepare;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + val = FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN0_DOWNSTREAM, 0x47) |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN1_DOWNSTREAM, 0x47) |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN0_UPSTREAM, 0x41) |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN1_UPSTREAM, 0x41);
> > > > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->base + PCIE_EQ_PRESET_01_REG);
> > > > +
> > > > + val = PCIE_K_PHYPARAM_QUERY | PCIE_K_QUERY_TIMEOUT |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_PRESET_TO_USE_16G, 0x80) |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_PRESET_TO_USE, 0x2) |
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_FINETUNE_MAX, 0xf);
> > > > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->base + PCIE_PIPE4_PIE8_REG);
> > >
> > > Why is this equalization stuff in the middle between
> > > clk_bulk_prepare() and clk_bulk_enable()? Is the split an actual
> > > requirement, or could we use clk_bulk_prepare_enable() here, like we
> > > do in mtk_pcie_power_up()?
> >
> > Nope, we can replace clk_bulk_enable() with clk_bulk_prepare_enable() and
> > remove clk_bulk_prepare() in mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up() since we actually
> > implements just enable callback for EN7581 in clk-en7523.c.
> >
> > > If the split is required, a comment about why would be helpful.
> > >
> > > > + err = clk_bulk_enable(pcie->num_clks, pcie->clks);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare clock\n");
> > > > + goto err_clk_enable;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Per https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZypgYOn7dcYIoW4i@lore-desk,
> > > REG_PCI_CONTROL is asserted/deasserted here by en7581_pci_enable().
> >
> > correct
> >
> > > Is this where PERST# is asserted? If so, a comment to that effect
> > > would be helpful. Where is PERST# deasserted? Where are the required
> > > delays before deassert done?
> >
> > I can add a comment in en7581_pci_enable() describing the PERST issue for
> > EN7581. Please note we have a 250ms delay in en7581_pci_enable() after
> > configuring REG_PCI_CONTROL register.
> >
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/clk/clk-en7523.c#L396
>
> Does that 250ms delay correspond to a PCIe mandatory delay, e.g.,
> something like PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS? I think it would be nice to have the
> required PCI delays in this driver if possible so it's easy to verify
> that they are all covered.
IIRC I just used the delay value used in the vendor sdk. I do not have a strong
opinion about it but I guess if we move it in the pcie-mediatek-gen3 driver, we
will need to add it in each driver where this clock is used. What do you think?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Bjorn
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 16:12 [PATCH v4 0/4] Add Airoha EN7581 PCIe support Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-07-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: add support for Airoha EN7581 Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-07-04 8:23 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-07-10 6:22 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-07-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add mtk_gen3_pcie_pdata data structure Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-07-10 6:26 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-07-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Rely on reset_bulk APIs for PHY reset lines Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-07-10 6:41 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-07-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add Airoha EN7581 support Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-07-10 7:02 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-11-05 21:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-06 23:00 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-11-06 23:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-06 20:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-06 22:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-06 23:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 7:39 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2024-11-07 15:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 16:21 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 16:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 21:56 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-08 1:23 ` 回复: " Hui Ma (马慧)
2024-11-08 16:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-09 9:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-11 2:16 ` 回复: " Hui Ma (马慧)
2024-08-20 8:46 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Add Airoha EN7581 PCIe support Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-08-20 14:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-03 13:47 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-09-03 13:45 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zyxuv-2SPuEXiL5R@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dd@embedd.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=upstream@airoha.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).