From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "Cedric Encarnacion" <cedricjustine.encarnacion@analog.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, "Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Delphine CC Chiu" <Delphine_CC_Chiu@wiwynn.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Radu Sabau" <radu.sabau@analog.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Alexis Czezar Torreno" <alexisczezar.torreno@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): add support for adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:29:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zz4OTBF66WfvnP2P@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cfb8bd8-4ce7-4474-b7c0-0fd2693ce34f@roeck-us.net>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 06:53:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/20/24 05:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:58:26AM +0800, Cedric Encarnacion wrote:
...
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADP1050_REGULATOR)
> >
> > Why? Is the data type undefined without this?
>
> Look into other drivers. That is how it is implemented there,
> and not really the point. One has to know about an alternative to use it.
>
> > > +static const struct regulator_desc adp1050_reg_desc[] = {
> > > + PMBUS_REGULATOR_ONE("vout"),
> > > +};
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_SENSORS_ADP1050_REGULATOR */
> >
> > Note, this can be dropped anyway in order to use PTR_IF() below, if required.
>
> FWIW, PTR_IF() isn't widely used, and I for my part was not aware that
> it exists.
Yeah, it's a relatively new one...
...
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADP1050_REGULATOR)
> > > + .num_regulators = 1,
> > > + .reg_desc = adp1050_reg_desc,
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Ditto, are the fields not defined without the symbol?
>
> They are, but they must be 0/NULL. PTR_IF() would be an alternative.
> It is a bit odd to use it for a non-pointer, but it is type-agnostic,
> so using it should be ok to avoid the #ifdefs. We should maybe adopt
> that mechanism for other PMBus drivers.
I see, thanks for elaboration on all of this.
...
> > Please, split this patch to at least two:
> > 1) Introduce chip_info;
>
> That would really be "Use driver data to point to chip info".
I agree on the title, what I meant is the rough description of what
should be done in the change.
> > 2) add new devices.
>
> I don't really care much about separating those two (after all, they are
> related), but adding regulator support to the driver is a major change
> and should be a separate patch. On top of that, it isn't even mentioned
> in the patch description.
Indeed, that's why I mentioned "at least" in the reply.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 3:58 [PATCH 0/2] Add support for ADP1051/ADP1055 and LTP8800-1A/-2/-4A Cedric Encarnacion
2024-11-20 3:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add bindings for adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800 Cedric Encarnacion
2024-11-20 17:11 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-20 17:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-20 18:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-20 18:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-25 2:44 ` Encarnacion, Cedric justine
2024-11-29 9:12 ` Nuno Sá
2024-11-20 18:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-23 19:56 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-23 19:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-25 2:44 ` Encarnacion, Cedric justine
2024-11-25 18:48 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-20 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): add support " Cedric Encarnacion
2024-11-20 5:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-11-20 13:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-20 13:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-20 14:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-20 16:29 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-11-25 3:07 ` Encarnacion, Cedric justine
2024-11-20 14:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-21 21:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-22 13:46 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-23 3:11 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-27 0:56 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zz4OTBF66WfvnP2P@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Delphine_CC_Chiu@wiwynn.com \
--cc=alexisczezar.torreno@analog.com \
--cc=cedricjustine.encarnacion@analog.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=radu.sabau@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).