From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm: dts: r8a7790: add cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:55:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0099e02-096c-f8e0-0380-ecb9549f20b4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918073946.GA9156@verge.net.au>
On 18/09/17 08:39, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> The following 'capacity-dmips-mhz' dt property values are used:
>>
>> Cortex-A15: 1024, Cortex-A7: 539
>>
>> They have been derived form the cpu_efficiency values:
>>
>> Cortex-A15: 3891, Cortex-A7: 2048
>>
>> by scaling them so that the Cortex-A15s (big cores) use 1024.
>>
>> The cpu_efficiency values were originally derived from the "Big.LITTLE
>> Processing with ARM Cortex™-A15 & Cortex-A7" white paper
>> (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rdm34/big.LITTLE.pdf). Table 1 lists 1.9x
>> (3891/2048) as the Cortex-A15 vs Cortex-A7 performance ratio for the
>> Dhrystone benchmark.
>>
>> The following platform is affected once cpu-invariant accounting
>> support is re-connected to the task scheduler:
>
> Thanks, applied for v4.15.
>
> My understanding from the following comment in the cover letter is that not
> currently the case and this there is no behavioural change in applying this
> patch.
>
> For the record I observed the following with and without this patch
> applied. I believe this is the expected result.
>
> v4.14-rc1
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity
> 1535
> 1535
> 1535
> 1535
> 1024
> 1024
> 1024
> 1024
>
> v4.14-rc1 + patch
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity
> 1024
> 1024
> 1024
> 1024
> 539
> 539
> 539
> 539
Thanks Simon! Yes, that is the expected behaviour. And sorry for not
responding earlier!
With exynos542{0,2} and r8a7790 switching to the 'capacity-dmips-mhz'
based solution in v4.15, I can push for removal of the cpu_efficency
code [patch 1/4].
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 14:41 [PATCH 0/4] arm: remove cpu_efficiency Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: topology: " Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <20170830144120.9312-2-dietmar.eggemann-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-04 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-09-06 11:43 ` Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <303d3f7b-5d64-e13a-c4f9-dd575958cafa-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-06 12:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-09-07 10:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: exynos: add exynos5420 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <20170830144120.9312-3-dietmar.eggemann-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-30 20:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-08-31 10:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-09-03 19:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-09-06 11:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-09-17 7:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
[not found] ` <20170830144120.9312-1-dietmar.eggemann-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: dts: exynos: add exynos5422 " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-09-17 7:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: dts: r8a7790: add " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-09-18 7:39 ` Simon Horman
2017-10-09 17:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0099e02-096c-f8e0-0380-ecb9549f20b4@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).