Re: [PATCH 09/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add UFS nodes

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 01/09/2022 10:24, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> The SM6115 comes with UFS support, so add the related UFS and UFS PHY
> nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> index cde963c56ac9..491fffff8aa1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> @@ -620,6 +620,76 @@ opp-202000000 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@4804000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm6115-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
> +				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> +			reg = <0x4804000 0x3000>, <0x4810000 0x8000>;
> +			reg-names = "std", "ice";

I could imagine that testing DTS against existing bindings might miss a
lot, because we have still a lot of errors. But at least I would expect
you test your DTS against your own bindings, which you submit here (and
previously).

You just wrote that ice is not allowed.

> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
> +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> +			reset-names = "rst";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x100 0>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>,
> +				 <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
> +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
> +				      "iface_clk",
> +				      "core_clk_unipro",
> +				      "core_clk_ice",
> +				      "ref_clk",
> +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk";
> +
> +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<37500000 150000000>,
> +					<75000000 300000000>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>;
> +
> +			non-removable;

Is it allowed property?

> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@4807000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
> +			reg = <0x4807000 0x1c4>;
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <1>;
> +			ranges;
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_CLKREF_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
> +
> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> +			status = "disabled";
> +
> +			ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@4807400 {
> +				reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
> +				      <0x4807600 0x130>,
> +				      <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
> +				#phy-cells = <0>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +

Just one blank line.

Best regards,
Krzysztof