From: Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RFT PATCH v1 0/1] ARM: orion5x: convert D-Link DNS-323 to the Device Tree
Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 22:34:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0908aaa-154e-a53b-7538-a0b6557a30ae@ext.kapsi.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220508152237.3hw657gcba2fvheq@pali>
On 08.05.22 18:22, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2022 17:02:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 4:06 PM Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi> wrote:
>>> On 28.4.2022 23.56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:01 PM Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi> wrote:
>>>>> On 27.4.2022 21.10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:21 PM Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi> wrote:
>>>>>>> - sata_mv fails to initialise with -22 (-EINVAL)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No idea, I'd try inserting a printk in every code path that can return -EINVAL
>>>>>> from there
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> With debugging the reason for -EINVAL remains a bit mystery.
>>> - sata_mv calls ata_host_activate() [1]
>>> - later on, in request_threaded_irq(), there are sanity checks [2]
>>> - that fail with irq_settings_can_request() returning 0 [3]
>>>
>>> I cannot really put my finger on why the irq cannot be requested in DT
>>> approach.
>>
>> Are you sure the marvell,orion-intc driver is successfully probed
>> at this point? If not, the interrupt won't be there.
I made the pci setup to be the very last thing in the boot and
results are still the same. There are other devices that do get
their interrupts from intc.
>>
>> I see that the "sata_mv" driver can be used either as a platform
>> driver for the orion5x on-chip controller, or as a PCI driver for
>> an add-on chip connected to the external bus. It sounds like
>> your system has both. Do you know which one fails?
>>
>> The PCI driver cannot work unless the PCI host works correctly,
>> and that in turn requires a correct devicetree description for it.
>>
>>>>> Is there a way to describe the PCIe bus in the
>>>>> device tree? The initalisation of that bus is done for rev A1 only.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not too familiar with the platform, but my interpretation is that the
>>>> DT support here is incomplete:
>>>>
>>>> The DT based PCI probe using drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
>>>> is not hooked up in orion5x.dtsi, and the traditional pci code does
>>>> not work with DT.
>>>
>>> Can the existing pci code still be used to init the PCI bus and describe
>>> the rest in the DT or is it a futile attempt?
>
> Hello! Orion uses arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c driver for both PCI and
> PCIe buses. This is not device tree driver.
>
>>>> I see that orion5x has two separate blocks -- a PCIe host that is
>>>> similar to the kirkwood one, and a legacy PCI host that needs
>>>> a completely separate driver.
>>>>
>>>> Which of the two do you actually need here?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I really cannot say which one is it. How can I tell? The functions given
>>> in struct hw_pci find their way to drivers/pci/probe.c eventually and
>>> use pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(). Nothing seems to utilising mvebu or
>>> kirkwood explicitly at least.
>>>
>>> Here's the output from lspci if the ids reveal anything.
>>>
>>> # lspci -v -k
>>> 00:00.0 Class 0580: 11ab:5181
>>> 01:00.0 Class 0580: 11ab:5181
>>> 00:01.0 Class 0100: 11ab:7042 sata_mv
>>
>> The first two seem to be the host bridges, but unfortunately they
>> seem both have the same device ID, despite being very different
>> devices. The first one (00:00.0) should be the PCIe driver, the
>> second one (01.00.0) the legacy PCI one. In this case, the 11ab:7042
>> device is a PCIe device, and it's on the bus (00) of the first host
>> bridge. I think this should work with drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
>> if you add the bits for probing.
>
> Last time when I looked on Orion PCIe controller registers, I though
> that they are same as in Kirkwood PCIe controller registers. And
> Kirkwood is already supported by pci-mvebu.c driver.
>
I seemed that way to me too on the first glance. And it looks like there
are no devices using the PCI driver. I knocked off that part altogether
and the boot log looks pretty much the same it was. Perhaps I can do
with describing the PCIe bus only.
> About PCI host bridge, I do not know.
>
> Beware that PCI Class Id and all PCI registers which are different for
> Type 0 and Type 1 are _broken_ on all PCIe Root Ports form all 32-bit
> Marvell SoCs. Those registers on Marvell SoCs have different meaning as
> what is defined in PCI and PCIe specs. So it means that lspci _may_
> display bogus information about PCIe Root Port. pci-mvebu.c uses Root
> Port emulator which fills correct data to make kernel and lspci happy.
>
> If you are going to extend pci-mvebu.c to support also Orion PCIe
> controller, I could try to help with it. But I do not have any Orion
> hardware, so just basic help...
I could make an attempt at this. Should I try to look at an existing
kirkwood based device first, say kirkwood-6281.dtsi? I didn't see
anything SoC-specific in pci-mvebu.c. All different compatibles seem
to share the same functionality.
>
> Links to Orion documentations, including PCIe errata is available in
> kernel documentation. So this could help to understand some details:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm/marvell.html
>
> Anyway, could you please provide 'lspci -nn -vv' and 'lspci -nn -t -v'
> outputs from Orion?
# lspci -nn -vv
0000:00:00.0 Memory controller [0580]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
88f5181 [Orion-1] ARM SoC [11ab:5181] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device [11ab:11ab]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort-
<MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
Region 0: Memory at <ignored> (64-bit, prefetchable)
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [60] Express (v1) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag- RBE-
DevCtl: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq-
RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Exit Latency L0s
<256ns
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 128 bytes, Disabled- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s (ok), Width x1 (ok)
TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
RootCap: CRSVisible-
RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-
RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
0000:00:01.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Marvell Technology Group
Ltd. 88SX7042 PCI-e 4-port SATA-II [11ab:7042] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device [11ab:11ab]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort-
<MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 12
Region 0: Memory at e0000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
Region 2: I/O ports at 1000 [size=256]
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [60] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <256ns, L1 <1us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
DevCtl: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq-
RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L0s, Exit Latency L0s
<256ns
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 128 bytes, Disabled- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s (ok), Width x1 (downgraded)
TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
Kernel driver in use: sata_mv
0001:01:00.0 Memory controller [0580]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
88f5181 [Orion-1] ARM SoC [11ab:5181] (rev 03)
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B+ DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort+ >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
BIST result: 00
Region 0: Memory at <unassigned> (64-bit, prefetchable)
Region 2: Memory at <ignored> (64-bit, prefetchable)
Region 4: Memory at <ignored> (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
Expansion ROM at <ignored> [disabled]
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk+ DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME+
Capabilities: [48] Vital Product Data
Not readable
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [60] PCI-X non-bridge device
Command: DPERE- ERO- RBC=512 OST=4
Status: Dev=ff:1f.0 64bit+ 133MHz+ SCD- USC- DC=bridge DMMRBC=512
DMOST=4 DMCRS=8 RSCEM- 266MHz- 533MHz-
Capabilities: [68] CompactPCI hot-swap <?>
# lspci -nn -t -v
-+-[0001:01]---00.0 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88f5181 [Orion-1] ARM
SoC [11ab:5181]
\-[0000:00]-+-00.0 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88f5181 [Orion-1]
ARM SoC [11ab:5181]
\-01.0 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SX7042 PCI-e
4-port SATA-II [11ab:7042]
>
>> Thomas Petazzoni originally wrote the new driver, and I think he was
>> planning at one point to use it for orion5x. I don't know if there were
>> any major problems preventing this at the time, or if it just needs to
>> get hooked up in the dtsi file.
>>
>> Arnd
-- Mauri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-08 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 16:21 [RFC RFT PATCH v1 0/1] ARM: orion5x: convert D-Link DNS-323 to the Device Tree Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-27 16:21 ` [RFC RFT PATCH v1 1/1] " Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-27 18:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-04-28 20:06 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-28 20:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-04-28 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-28 20:09 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-27 18:10 ` [RFC RFT PATCH v1 0/1] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-04-28 0:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-28 20:25 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-28 23:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-03 8:20 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-28 20:01 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-28 20:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-08 14:06 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-05-08 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <20220508152237.3hw657gcba2fvheq@pali>
2022-05-08 19:34 ` Mauri Sandberg [this message]
[not found] ` <20220508201044.qyh75mb4x64uuhfc@pali>
2022-05-09 10:52 ` Mauri Sandberg
[not found] ` <20220508154126.3wubyyunpuxetswm@pali>
2022-05-09 7:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-09 10:48 ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-04-28 0:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: orion5x: add D-Link DNS323 based on device treee Mauri Sandberg
2022-09-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: add DT binding for D-Link DNS-323 Mauri Sandberg
2022-09-22 20:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-23 9:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: orion5x: Add D-Link DNS-323 Device Tree Mauri Sandberg
2022-09-22 20:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-22 21:14 ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-22 21:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-23 9:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-27 11:26 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-27 22:56 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: orion5x: Add D-Link DNS-323 based on " Mauri Sandberg
2022-09-22 21:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-23 9:03 ` maukka
2022-09-23 12:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-23 18:02 ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-26 11:56 ` maukka
2022-09-26 12:23 ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-28 13:32 ` [EXT] " Elad Nachman
2022-09-30 15:40 ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-23 9:13 ` maukka
2022-09-23 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0908aaa-154e-a53b-7538-a0b6557a30ae@ext.kapsi.fi \
--to=maukka@ext.kapsi.fi \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).