From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] AS3645A fixes Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 21:39:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170922093238.13070-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <650b7cb3-f7dd-5959-3147-df7284415521@gmail.com> <076725cc-ef46-898d-34e5-099ece5d50b4@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <076725cc-ef46-898d-34e5-099ece5d50b4@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sakari Ailus , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Sakari, On 09/22/2017 11:25 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > (Fixed DT list address.) > > Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Hi Sakari, >> >> On 09/22/2017 11:32 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> Hi Jacek and others, >>> >>> Here are a few fixes for the as3645a DTS as well as changes in bindings. >>> The driver is not in a release yet. >>> >>> Jacek: Could you take these to your fixes branch so we don't get >>> faulty DT >>> bindings to a release? I've dropped the patches related to LED naming >>> and >>> label property as the discusion appears to continue on that. >> >> No problem. One question - isn't patch 3/4 missing? > > Hmm. I can see it on both linux-leds and devicetree. > > I've pushed the four patches here, on v4.14-rc1: > > I turned out that gmail treated your patches as spam due to your "resend" patch set. Patch set applied to the fixes-4.14-rc3 branch of linux-leds.git. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski