Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] firmware: qcom: scm: Register gunyah watchdog device

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 18/11/2025 12:18, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> 
> On 11/18/2025 4:10 PM, Hrishabh Rajput via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Hrishabh Rajput <hrishabh.rajput@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> To restrict Gunyah watchdog initialization to Qualcomm platforms running
>> under the Gunyah Hypervisor, register the watchdog device in the QCOM
>> SCM driver.
>>
>> When Gunyah is not present or Gunyah emulates MMIO-based watchdog, we
>> expect Qualcomm watchdog or ARM SBSA watchdog device to be present in
>> the devicetree. First, we make sure we're running under the Gunyah
>> Hypervisor. Then we move to check if any of the above mentioned
>> watchdog device nodes are present, if not then we proceed to register
>> the SMC-based Gunyah watchdog device.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Tested-by: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hrishabh Rajput <hrishabh.rajput@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>> index e777b7cb9b12..14d0663316e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>> @@ -2182,6 +2182,56 @@ int qcom_scm_qtee_callback_response(phys_addr_t buf, size_t buf_size,
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_qtee_callback_response);
>>   
>> +static void qcom_scm_gunyah_wdt_free(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct platform_device *gunyah_wdt_dev = data;
>> +
>> +	platform_device_unregister(gunyah_wdt_dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcom_scm_gunyah_wdt_init(struct qcom_scm *scm)
>> +{
>> +	struct platform_device *gunyah_wdt_dev;
>> +	struct device_node *np;
> 
> nit: Can we use the __cleanup() attribute for device_node like below and 
> drop the explicit of_node_put()?
> 
> struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = NULL;

Please don't. It is not desired style, error prone and not helping.

Don't use cleanup.h if you are not accustomed to its specific style.


Best regards,
Krzysztof