From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add sm8350, sc8280xp and generic OSM L3 compatibles
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:12:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a364b343-fa19-348c-bc38-e8b44061890b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221028034155.5580-6-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
On 27/10/2022 23:41, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also
> introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> index bf538c0c5a81..ae0995341a78 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3
> - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3
> - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3
> - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3
> - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3
> - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
> + oneOf:
> + items:
oneOf expects a list, so this should be " - items"
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3
> + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3
> + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3
> + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3
> + - const: qcom,osm-l3
The concept is good, but are you sure all SoCs will be compatible with
generic osm-l3? Why not using dedicated compatible of one soc, e.g. the
oldest here? We already did like that for BWMON, DMA and few others.
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3
> + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3
> + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
> + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3
> + - const: qcom,epss-l3
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 3:41 [PATCH 00/10] interconnect: osm-l3: SC8280XP L3 and DDR scaling Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 01/10] interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Use platform-independent node ids Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 02/10] interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Squash common descriptors Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 03/10] interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Add per-core EPSS L3 support Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 04/10] interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Simplify osm_l3_set() Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add sm8350, sc8280xp and generic OSM L3 compatibles Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 12:20 ` Rob Herring
2022-10-28 22:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-11-03 3:44 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-11-03 12:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-03 15:46 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-11-03 15:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: dts: qcom: Align with generic osm-l3/epss-l3 Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add epss_l3 node Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Set up L3 scaling Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 09/10] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,msm8998-bwmon: Add sc8280xp bwmon instances Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 22:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-03 3:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-11-03 12:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-28 3:41 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add " Bjorn Andersson
2022-10-28 22:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-29 1:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] interconnect: osm-l3: SC8280XP L3 and DDR scaling Steev Klimaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a364b343-fa19-348c-bc38-e8b44061890b@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_bjorande@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).