public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: kishon@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com,
	peter.harliman.liem@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: intel-lgm-sdxc: Add support for SDXC PHY
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:38:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a36dcf94-4636-1742-4ae6-60cf2c03c7f5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904123957.GM2680@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi Andy,

  Thank you for the review comments .

On 4/9/2019 8:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 02:27:19PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add support for SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
> What's the difference to eMMC PHY?
> Can they share the same / similar code?
eMMC and SDXC interface controller share the common driver since IP block
of the vendor(SDHC-ARASAN) is same, where as PHY is different. The PHY 
is designed by Intel itself to support
specific eMMC card and SD/SDIO card specific. e.g: PAD, CLK, driver 
strength..etc.

IP block of the PHY  is different module for eMMC and SDXC to adapt the 
controllers, that is reason we have different drivers.
---
With Best Regards
Vadivel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-04  6:27 [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2019-09-04  6:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: intel-lgm-sdxc: Add support for " Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2019-09-04 12:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-04 13:38     ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX [this message]
2019-09-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM " Rob Herring
2019-09-18  2:26   ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a36dcf94-4636-1742-4ae6-60cf2c03c7f5@linux.intel.com \
    --to=vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=cheol.yong.kim@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.harliman.liem@intel.com \
    --cc=qi-ming.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox