From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiada Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 2/4] spi: imx: add selection for iMX53 and iMX6 controller Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:28:03 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20170608051603.16070-1-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170608051603.16070-3-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170612155345.qtgaq4wjj2vidohd@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170612155345.qtgaq4wjj2vidohd@rob-hp-laptop> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, fabio.estevam-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Rob On 06/13/2017 12:53 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:16:01PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote: >> ECSPI contorller for iMX53 and iMX6 has few hardware issues >> comparing to iMX51. >> The change add possibility to detect which controller is used >> to apply possible workaround and limitations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt | 1 + >> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >> index 31b5b21..5bf1396 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Required properties: >> - "fsl,imx31-cspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on i.MX31 >> - "fsl,imx35-cspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on i.MX35 >> - "fsl,imx51-ecspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on i.MX51 >> + - "fsl,imx53-ecspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on i.MX53 and later Soc >> - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device >> - interrupts : Should contain CSPI/eCSPI interrupt >> - cs-gpios : Specifies the gpio pins to be used for chipselects. >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> index 4469121..8e6f339 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype { >> IMX27_CSPI, >> IMX31_CSPI, >> IMX35_CSPI, /* CSPI on all i.mx except above */ >> - IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 and later */ >> + IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 */ >> + IMX53_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */ > > Looks like i.MX51 and i.MX53 are the same. While the DT should have > different compatibles (with fallbacks), the driver should map them to > the same type until there's some difference found. > the difference between i.MX51 and i.MX53 is introduced in the 4th patch "spi: imx: Add support for SPI Slave mode" in this patch set do you think, I need to merge the two patches into one? Thanks, Jiada > Rob > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html