From: Damon Ding <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Add HPD support for Rockchip Analogix DP
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:50:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a51a6359-c00c-4190-b3ef-13c79bb5bfed@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5209243.oAaWjsssbx@diego>
Hi Heiko,
On 7/31/2026 6:30 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Damon,
>
> Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2026, 11:55:42 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon Ding:
>> On 7/31/2026 5:23 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2026, 05:08:45 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon Ding:
>>>> On 7/31/2026 2:49 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>> Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2026, 05:27:37 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon Ding:
>>>>>> This series improves the HPD (Hotplug Detect) interrupt handling in
>>>>>> the Analogix DP driver to enable reliable native HPD pin detection on
>>>>>> Rockchip platforms, and introduces platform-specific HPD detection
>>>>>> schemes with fine-grained interrupt control.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tested on RK3576 with both native HPD pin and GPIO HPD configurations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Native HPD pin mode:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> &edp {
>>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&edp_txm0_pins>;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GPIO HPD mode:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> &edp {
>>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&edp0_hpd>;
>>>>>> hpd-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> &pinctrl {
>>>>>> edp {
>>>>>> edp0_hpd: edp0-hpd {
>>>>>> rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PC1 0 &pcfg_pull_none>;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> Yay and thanks a lot for working on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I roll my display-port carrier board back to the analogix-dp being
>>>>> the endpoint, this works exactly as expected :-) .
>>>>>
>>>>> I can plug in the display at some point after the boot and have it
>>>>> detected and setup correctly. Same with unplugging it while
>>>>> the system is running. The connection status is correctly reported
>>>>> in sysfs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Though there is a caveat. When the eDP is not the last part, this does not
>>>>> work anymore. The detect function always returns "connected" if there is
>>>>> a next bridge available.
>>>>>
>>>>> My board [0] has a physical DP connector on it, so models it as
>>>>> dp-connector, but in that case the Analogix driver always reports being
>>>>> connected.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20251009225050.88192-3-heiko@sntech.de/
>>>>> ... same effect with hpd-gpios in either the edp node or dp-connector node
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My previous tests were carried out on the modified RK3576 IOTEST board
>>>> DTS based on RK3576 EVB1, which includes dp-connector by default. I also
>>>> did extra verification without dp-connector, and HPD detection works
>>>> correctly in both cases.
>>>>
>>>> I've taken a look at the Tiger board DT configuration. The pinctrl
>>>> settings for the eDP HPD GPIO may need adjustment:
>>>>
>>>> &pinctrl {
>>>> edp0 {
>>>> edp0_hpd_l: edp0-hpd-l-pin {
>>>> rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PB5 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> It is recommended to configure GPIO4B5 as pull-down or pll-none. Pull-up
>>>> configuration may prevent GPIO interrupts from being triggered properly,
>>>> resulting in a permanent "connected" status.
>>>
>>> At least on that DP-carrier the pin direction is different.
>>> I.e. it is active-low, meaning 0 for plugged in.
>>>
>>> In the schematics I do see a hw pull up too - so pull-none in the pinconfig
>>> would also be possible, but pull-down is definitly wrong on _this_ board.
>>>
>>> So we're talking about the same code, I put the dts up on [0] .
>>>
>>> I'm currently running with a printk diff [1] to showcase the issue.
>>>
>>> So on boot, with the display unplugged I get:
>>> [ 14.757911] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 14.757914] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 14.757918] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 14.773779] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 14.838658] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to read dpcd caps: -110
>>> [ 14.838662] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* dp commit error, ret = -110
>>> [ 14.838670] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 0
>>> [ 14.884791] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to read dpcd caps: -110
>>> [ 14.884793] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* dp commit error, ret = -110
>>> [ 14.884796] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 1
>>> [ 14.930925] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to read dpcd caps: -110
>>> [ 14.930927] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* dp commit error, ret = -110
>>> [ 14.930930] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 2
>>> [ 14.977032] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to read dpcd caps: -110
>>> [ 14.977034] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* dp commit error, ret = -110
>>> [ 14.977037] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 3
>>> [ 15.023150] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to read dpcd caps: -110
>>> [ 15.023152] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* dp commit error, ret = -110
>>> [ 15.023155] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 4
>>> [ 15.023168] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: too many times retry set bridge, give it up
>>> [ 15.052485] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30
>>> [ 15.210457] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: [drm] fb0: rockchipdrmfb frame buffer device
>>> [ 15.223444] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 15.231974] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 15.239587] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 15.245341] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>>
>>> So analogix_dp_bridge_detect() is called and always returns connected.
>>>
>>> Plugging in the the display, I get:
>>> [ 290.592096] ---> display_connector_detect gpio value is 1 {display-connector returning connected}
>>> [ 290.598648] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 290.604637] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 290.609826] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 290.615784] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>>
>>> Unplugging the display, I get:
>>> [ 302.081444] ---> display_connector_detect gpio value is 0 {display-connector returning disconnected}
>>> [ 302.087996] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 302.093945] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 302.099131] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 302.105090] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 302.144834] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 302.150784] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>> [ 302.155933] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
>>> [ 302.161859] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>>>
>>>
>>> So it looks like on the gpio-side the detection is correct and/but
>>> analogix_dp_bridge_detect() is always returning a connected state
>>> ("b" output is never reached).
>>>
>>> I'm still working on understanding how the whole detection logic works
>>> in drm ;-) .
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think I've spotted the environmental difference between our setups.
>> Your DTS places the hpd-gpios property under the dp-connector node,
>> which is a scenario I haven't covered yet. I will reproduce and test
>> this case locally.
>>
>> As a quick experiment, could you try removing hpd-gpios from
>> dp-connector and move it under the edp node instead? As expected, GPIO
>> HPD should work properly with that configuration.
>
> I've updated the branch in [0] with that hpd move to the edp node, but
> the result is similar:
>
> With the panel _disconnected_ on boot I see
> [ 12.887555] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
> [ 12.893104] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
> [ 12.897881] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
> [ 12.903424] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
> [ 14.124848] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* failed to get hpd single ret = -110
> [ 14.124891] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 0
> [ 14.236031] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* failed to get hpd single ret = -110
> [ 14.236074] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 1
> [ 14.346940] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* failed to get hpd single ret = -110
> [ 14.346990] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 2
> [ 14.458590] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* failed to get hpd single ret = -110
> [ 14.458638] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 3
> [ 14.570262] [drm:analogix_dp_bridge_atomic_enable [analogix_dp]] *ERROR* failed to get hpd single ret = -110
> [ 14.570312] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: failed to set bridge, retry: 4
> [ 14.570328] rockchip-dp fdec0000.edp: too many times retry set bridge, give it up
> [ 14.751371] ---> drm_bridge_connector_detect: detect
> [ 14.757207] ---> analogix_dp_bridge_detect a
>
> So with the diff from earlier, analogix_dp_bridge_detect() still runs,
> finds its next bridge and returns "connected".
>
> I.e. the
>>> if (dp->plat_data->next_bridge)
>>> return connector_status_connected;
>
> part.
>
>
Thanks a lot for running the test and confirming the behaviour. I've
also reproduced this issue locally.
I will dig deeper into this problem and fix this incorrect connection
status logic in v2. :-)
Best regards,
Damon
>
>
>
>>> [0] https://github.com/mmind/linux-rockchip/blob/dev/v7.3/rk3588-tiger-dp-carrier-v5/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger-displayport-carrier.dts
>>> [1]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>>> index 7a89548a7a885..0accdf62637ae 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>>> @@ -915,8 +915,10 @@ analogix_dp_bridge_detect(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_connector *conne
>>> struct analogix_dp_device *dp = to_dp(bridge);
>>> enum drm_connector_status status = connector_status_disconnected;
>>>
>>> +printk("---> %s a\n", __func__);
>>> if (dp->plat_data->next_bridge)
>>> return connector_status_connected;
>>> +printk("---> %s b\n", __func__);
>>>
>>> if (!analogix_dp_detect_hpd(dp))
>>> status = connector_status_connected;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c
>>> index 16c0631adeb18..b0c07694b82e3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c
>>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static enum drm_connector_status display_connector_detect(struct drm_bridge *bri
>>> struct display_connector *conn = to_display_connector(bridge);
>>>
>>> if (conn->hpd_gpio) {
>>> +printk("---> %s gpio value is %d\n", __func__, gpiod_get_value_cansleep(conn->hpd_gpio));
>>> if (gpiod_get_value_cansleep(conn->hpd_gpio))
>>> return connector_status_connected;
>>> else
>>> @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ static enum drm_connector_status display_connector_detect(struct drm_bridge *bri
>>> static enum drm_connector_status
>>> display_connector_bridge_detect(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_connector *connector)
>>> {
>>> +printk("---> %s\n", __func__);
>>> return display_connector_detect(bridge);
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_bridge_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_bridge_connector.c
>>> index 649969fca1413..8816d837c9a77 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_bridge_connector.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_bridge_connector.c
>>> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ drm_bridge_connector_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>>> enum drm_connector_status status;
>>>
>>> if (detect) {
>>> +printk("---> %s: detect\n", __func__);
>>> status = detect->funcs->detect(detect, connector);
>>>
>>> if (hdmi)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 3:27 [PATCH v1 0/7] Add HPD support for Rockchip Analogix DP Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Manage pm runtime and IRQ for native HPD pin detection Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Return bitmask from analogix_dp_get_irq_type() Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Extend mute/unmute HPD interrupts to accept irq bitmask Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Extend clear_hotplug_interrupts to accept IRQ bitmask Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Simplify analogix_dp_config_interrupt() Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Use platform-specific HPD detection scheme Damon Ding
2026-07-30 3:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Skip native HPD interrupt ops for GPIO HPD Damon Ding
2026-07-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] Add HPD support for Rockchip Analogix DP Heiko Stübner
2026-07-31 3:08 ` Damon Ding
2026-07-31 9:23 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-07-31 9:55 ` Damon Ding
2026-07-31 10:30 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-08-03 1:50 ` Damon Ding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a51a6359-c00c-4190-b3ef-13c79bb5bfed@rock-chips.com \
--to=damon.ding@rock-chips.com \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox