* [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
@ 2023-09-28 22:21 Fabio Estevam
2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-09-28 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel.lezcano
Cc: rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm,
devicetree, Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
The number of fsl,tmu-range entries vary among the several NXP SoCs.
- lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
- imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,imx8mq-tmu compatible)
- imx93 has seven fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
Change minItems and maxItems accordingly.
This fixes the following schema warning:
imx93-11x11-evk.dtb: tmu@44482000: fsl,tmu-range: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
[2147483866, 2147483881, 2147483906, 2147483946, 2147484006, 2147484071, 2147484086] is too long
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
---
Changes since v1:
- Adjust min/maxItems to cover all NXP SoCs.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
index ee4780f186f9..60b9d79e7543 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ properties:
description: |
The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
- minItems: 4
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 7
fsl,tmu-calibration:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-09-28 22:21 [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems Fabio Estevam @ 2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-10-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Estevam Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1857 bytes --] On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:21:30PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > The number of fsl,tmu-range entries vary among the several NXP SoCs. > > - lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible) > - imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,imx8mq-tmu compatible) > - imx93 has seven fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible) > > Change minItems and maxItems accordingly. > > This fixes the following schema warning: > > imx93-11x11-evk.dtb: tmu@44482000: fsl,tmu-range: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > [2147483866, 2147483881, 2147483906, 2147483946, 2147484006, 2147484071, 2147484086] is too long > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should be added, since each of the devices listed above has different requirements. Thanks, Conor. > --- > Changes since v1: > - Adjust min/maxItems to cover all NXP SoCs. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > index ee4780f186f9..60b9d79e7543 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ properties: > description: | > The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC > reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc. > - minItems: 4 > + minItems: 2 > + maxItems: 7 > > fsl,tmu-calibration: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix > -- > 2.34.1 > [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam 2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-09 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam Hi Conor, On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:27 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should > be added, since each of the devices listed above has different > requirements. Ok, I am trying to add the device constraints as suggested. For example: I am trying to describe that imx93 has 7 items for fsl,tmu-range: --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: enum: - fsl,qoriq-tmu - fsl,imx8mq-tmu + - fsl,imx93-tmu reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties: description: | The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc. - maxItems: 4 + items: + - description: TTR0CR + - description: TTR1CR + - description: TTR2CR + - description: TTR3CR + - description: TTR4CR + - description: TTR5CR + - description: TTR6CR + minItems: 4 fsl,tmu-calibration: $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix @@ -69,15 +78,33 @@ required: - fsl,tmu-calibration - '#thermal-sensor-cells' + +allOf: + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + enum: + - fsl,imx93-tmu + then: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + minItems: 7 + maxItems: 7 + else: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + maxItems: 4 + additionalProperties: false examples: - | tmu@f0000 { - compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; + compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; - fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>; + fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>; fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>, <0x00000001 0x00000028>, <0x00000002 0x0000002d>, but dt_binding_check fails: $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml -j12 LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb /home/fabio/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb: tmu@f0000: fsl,tmu-range: [[655360, 589862, 524362, 65642, 0, 0, 0]] is too short from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml# What is wrong with the yaml changes to tell that imx93 has 7 items for fsl,tmu-range? Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-09 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Estevam Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5423 bytes --] On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 04:22:31PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Conor, > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:27 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should > > be added, since each of the devices listed above has different > > requirements. > > Ok, I am trying to add the device constraints as suggested. > > For example: I am trying to describe that imx93 has 7 items for fsl,tmu-range: > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: > enum: > - fsl,qoriq-tmu > - fsl,imx8mq-tmu > + - fsl,imx93-tmu > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties: > description: | > The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC > reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc. > - maxItems: 4 > + items: > + - description: TTR0CR > + - description: TTR1CR > + - description: TTR2CR > + - description: TTR3CR > + - description: TTR4CR > + - description: TTR5CR > + - description: TTR6CR > + minItems: 4 > > fsl,tmu-calibration: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix > @@ -69,15 +78,33 @@ required: > - fsl,tmu-calibration > - '#thermal-sensor-cells' > > + ^^ extra newline here I think. > +allOf: > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + enum: > + - fsl,imx93-tmu > + then: > + properties: > + fsl,tmu-range: > + minItems: 7 > + maxItems: 7 > + else: > + properties: > + fsl,tmu-range: > + maxItems: 4 > + > additionalProperties: false > > examples: > - | > tmu@f0000 { > - compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; > + compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; > - fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>; > + fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>; > fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>, > <0x00000001 0x00000028>, > <0x00000002 0x0000002d>, > > but dt_binding_check fails: > > $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml -j12 > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb > /home/fabio/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb: > tmu@f0000: fsl,tmu-range: [[655360, 589862, 524362, 65642, 0, 0, 0]] > is too short > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml# > > What is wrong with the yaml changes to tell that imx93 has 7 items for > fsl,tmu-range? You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. I think something like the below better matches your constraints? diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml index 145744027234..540169806cc8 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: enum: - fsl,qoriq-tmu - fsl,imx8mq-tmu + - fsl,imx93-tmu reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -33,7 +34,17 @@ properties: description: | The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc. - maxItems: 4 + items: + items: + - description: TTR0CR + - description: TTR1CR + - description: TTR2CR + - description: TTR3CR + - description: TTR4CR + - description: TTR5CR + - description: TTR6CR + minItems: 4 + maxItems: 1 fsl,tmu-calibration: $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix @@ -69,15 +80,34 @@ required: - fsl,tmu-calibration - '#thermal-sensor-cells' + +allOf: + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + enum: + - fsl,imx93-tmu + then: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + items: + minItems: 7 + else: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + items: + maxItems: 4 + additionalProperties: false examples: - | tmu@f0000 { - compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; + compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; - fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>; + fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>; fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>, <0x00000001 0x00000028>, <0x00000002 0x0000002d>, [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam 2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-09 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree Hi Conor, On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote: > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. > I think something like the below better matches your constraints? Thanks for your example. With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly: if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7, dt_binding_check correctly complains. However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it expects 4, but it does not. On top of your patch: --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false examples: - | tmu@f0000 { - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>; make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb Any suggestions? Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-10 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3952 bytes --] On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Conor, > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints? > > Thanks for your example. > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly: > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7, > dt_binding_check correctly complains. > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it > expects 4, but it btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not 4. > does not. > > On top of your patch: > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false > examples: > - | > tmu@f0000 { > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 > 0>; > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings > DTEX > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > DTC_CHK > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb > > Any suggestions? I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff, but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint. Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking. The diff in question was something like: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml index 145744027234..50787938d605 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: enum: - fsl,qoriq-tmu - fsl,imx8mq-tmu + - fsl,imx93-tmu reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties: description: | The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc. - maxItems: 4 + minItems: 2 + items: + - description: TTR0CR + - description: TTR1CR + - description: TTR2CR + - description: TTR3CR + - description: TTR4CR + - description: TTR5CR + - description: TTR6CR fsl,tmu-calibration: $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix @@ -69,15 +78,30 @@ required: - fsl,tmu-calibration - '#thermal-sensor-cells' +allOf: + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + const: fsl,imx93-tmu + then: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + minItems: 7 + else: + properties: + fsl,tmu-range: + maxItems: 4 + additionalProperties: false examples: - | tmu@f0000 { - compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; + compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-tmu"; reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; - fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>; + fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0x0 0x0>; fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>, <0x00000001 0x00000028>, <0x00000002 0x0000002d>, [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring 2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2023-12-10 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Conor, > > > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. > > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints? > > > > Thanks for your example. > > > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly: > > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7, > > dt_binding_check correctly complains. > > > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it > > expects 4, but it > > btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not > 4. > > > does not. > > > > On top of your patch: > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false > > examples: > > - | > > tmu@f0000 { > > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; > > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; > > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; > > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 > > 0>; > > > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml > > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings > > DTEX > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > DTC_CHK > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb > > > > Any suggestions? > > I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix > this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to > ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff, > but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint. > > Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking. > The diff in question was something like: I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it tomorrow. Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring @ 2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-14 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2510 bytes --] On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:37:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > Hi Conor, > > > > > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. > > > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints? > > > > > > Thanks for your example. > > > > > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly: > > > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7, > > > dt_binding_check correctly complains. > > > > > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it > > > expects 4, but it > > > > btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not > > 4. > > > > > does not. > > > > > > On top of your patch: > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false > > > examples: > > > - | > > > tmu@f0000 { > > > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; > > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; > > > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; > > > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; > > > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 > > > 0>; > > > > > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings > > > DTEX > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts > > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > > DTC_CHK > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix > > this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to > > ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff, > > but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint. > > > > Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking. > > The diff in question was something like: > > I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it > tomorrow. Did you manage to figure out what was causing this btw? [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley @ 2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring 2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2024-01-03 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 10:13 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:37:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > > Hi Conor, > > > > > > > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT. > > > > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints? > > > > > > > > Thanks for your example. > > > > > > > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly: > > > > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7, > > > > dt_binding_check correctly complains. > > > > > > > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it > > > > expects 4, but it > > > > > > btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not > > > 4. > > > > > > > does not. > > > > > > > > On top of your patch: > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false > > > > examples: > > > > - | > > > > tmu@f0000 { > > > > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu"; > > > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu"; > > > > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; > > > > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>; > > > > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 > > > > 0>; > > > > > > > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml > > > > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings > > > > DTEX > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts > > > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json > > > > DTC_CHK > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix > > > this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to > > > ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff, > > > but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint. > > > > > > Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking. > > > The diff in question was something like: > > > > I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it > > tomorrow. > > Did you manage to figure out what was causing this btw? Yes. There's not really an immediate fix I see. The issue is in the if/then schemas we don't have enough information to know the type of fsl,tmu-range. To work correctly, it needs to be transformed to: fsl,tmu-range: items: minItems: 7 maxItems: 7 This goes back to everything gets encoded into a 2 dim matrix, but the schemas try to hide this encoding. My plan here is to eventually drop doing that and decode properties to their correct type. That will drop a lot of the fixups. I have patches to do that, but then it has other corner cases. So short term, I'd just leave things such that they don't warn or just drop the conditional. Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems 2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring @ 2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabio Estevam @ 2024-01-03 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring Cc: Conor Dooley, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:39 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > Yes. There's not really an immediate fix I see. The issue is in the > if/then schemas we don't have enough information to know the type of > fsl,tmu-range. To work correctly, it needs to be transformed to: > > fsl,tmu-range: > items: > minItems: 7 > maxItems: 7 Is this a typo? minItems cannot be 7. - lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries - imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries. > This goes back to everything gets encoded into a 2 dim matrix, but the > schemas try to hide this encoding. My plan here is to eventually drop > doing that and decode properties to their correct type. That will drop > a lot of the fixups. I have patches to do that, but then it has other > corner cases. > > So short term, I'd just leave things such that they don't warn or just > drop the conditional. Is my v3 proposal good then? https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20230928222130.580487-1-festevam@gmail.com/ It fixes all fsl,tmu-range warnings ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-03 21:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-09-28 22:21 [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems Fabio Estevam 2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam 2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam 2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring 2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring 2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).