From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mainlining.org (mail.mainlining.org [5.75.144.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E0044C4F8; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 10:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788345179; cv=none; b=NROXjbcw2n7q73pAAR9QOSO9fNZh9Gp8HbCORGrFjHvGQNZF9nE9mR1XCMfZ7VpURek01qQDBNScUVzUpWTXn+uBg+kxwUfzo4DudTFv1BrIlJ7ead9IZaVWFzyrsk13PztHd8OttWDyDNEzb2WdoxVZeM5/4gBvcWltFhklQOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788345179; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5JBdUXJJvuEcp7tks5LrPonCifHKYKUHk8238daTmPk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=F1I7xKqef1IEb16d0nZ5gnHIi5q7slECJlwxVHlEp0UkY40ErTsH2QJ9C0tfgZlqfmDyl3e++xy1zSzPk6HFntYGY8TFlWsu8aEUUX/QnQ7cawdy2fEhsbR88muHYWlHmMwbDdgmT42WrHHKlltaz8qHW/OFiMUvJ2mUDW+9crE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=KtUiesOt; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=JtpdZrUu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="KtUiesOt"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="JtpdZrUu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202507r; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1788345167; bh=5uz3wkS/ty/h0Bcac8Dx4yE 3FbjuVmTiQdoAOiTMxqE=; b=KtUiesOtDT7UctWzL4v+NT9d3y1LAbgbMetq30v6t/iN3S8C28 hwvOM/POgC1Gfiw9DgVfVhWjVbhBFOrAjlaxv6wJXt/Ht6AomGHzR0+43KKDQCB3+9NQ9mYboWP 0FkZmo1ZJ3k7/csi9RGvyJUJjOMhuOlytGGO2RKFBNczYwIpuolTV1nCZYyxkOwqX1QOdK+YK9E zVZCaTiuQ1sfAmJ0bFHYBFpcu0UmQScvSsdkjEJIbzLTPvz+4/wiyMambvy8/YEhVefKllPkTTq WAgf0V4+9CkVHdXxQsHaos33tcOn8agsGabctKh3GM/s+86uKfjN7YGseEeBUPW8wVA==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202507e; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1788345167; bh=5uz3wkS/ty/h0Bcac8Dx4yE 3FbjuVmTiQdoAOiTMxqE=; b=JtpdZrUuGXvVq7vn0XlP/nAlOO7Azkg3709+nmqgsbs89ZVawv 8D9W3oTnkanUpW1Q/cI9cMDCM6tLosS/b5CA==; Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 13:32:45 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add pinctrl support for MSM8952 To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij References: <20260820-msm8952-pinctrl-v2-0-bf2b8b7b379b@mainlining.org> From: Muzaffer Kadir Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 08:59:00 -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:37:50 +0200, Linus Walleij said: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 1:17 PM Muzaffer Kadir via B4 Relay >> wrote: >> >>> MSM8952 has pinctrl system that is similar to MSM8917 pinctrl, but it >>> has some differences in some of the pins and their functions. >>> This driver was tested on General Mobile GM 5 Plus >>> (shamrock) using my own kernel fork [1]. >>> I'm holding off on sending the GCC (Global Clock >>> Controller) driver and initial device tree until I've resolved some >>> outstanding bugs in the GCC driver. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/kadir1243/linux >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Muzaffer Kadir >> >> Bartosz needs to look at this series, he'll review and merge >> it. >> > > And to that end please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the current list > of maintainers for your patches. > > Bart Hi Bartosz, I did run b4 prep --auto-to-cc before sending the patches. After seeing your message I run it again to check and it said no new addresses to add. Should I rebase on newer tag? Best Regards, Muzaffer Kadir