From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55072289361 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.67 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750867021; cv=none; b=QHVvPjgVge0wP4Iq72mdbHTNERoQuNfkfn+0YUv8JxAXw2VC/yYqUOMRBghaEC3sGtcBGm9YbBN/rzmCC+4FBVtHB8JEf4nfkbCCU/T4HsQ5d1e4qBFhQ+vZD5tF719CvEQjUyKeHk/dgdlDzZ+HqEFOzju98jB5ufF0hSuLbQY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750867021; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FEkokS8/xuXk+goXO73ToH3BN/rlCiO0xkCJYNPSHPc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pHqnMNewe/QZoxa9l22qJ3eOIm7fZtGs5xXlFSfDBi3XJOfhZ8TR/EzLUSlLe0kOVOlz7rbTMPFaXZMJplJBUnM3AxxVPgaxDJwO85PTUm+yihN1vmwfetvZKge9i2nGDD1yG7vks8k6Ln66clZpTaoulrOIoqnK+VwBDNHAuXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=RvyzCJQN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.67 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="RvyzCJQN" Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4fea34e07so933226f8f.1 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:56:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1750867018; x=1751471818; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TnQ6U2Cyxfs2njJfr+S27AJxd4QZUS+L9XHalJW5Its=; b=RvyzCJQNVi28ZjZ24FTQzs6kGYdIzK8GLGefyKqQsnjMHeKSgjomVrkUpTS/lRaa7J rbk19URF4C32JxEPbDSeNlwY2giG9G9tv2Vufx4ne0bCCH2xtO11bqX9p4fwk5M+6zFG xOxli+jsTNjYLx56ESW+szOSu6peaTkoFupTMdXW9xrnc+hQzu1HtckrjVHhGvvfOJKR aOGk1IniMdmYDCIgEvDpImCNLkaHA4lx+hUGW6OoT6XqqN41xeFbe84sx8ip4UFQabTZ Lso2dcnopMzy4ijlchc6NzMNFfrKPslJjgewLILtHYxFNbk1TKrFfb5ST8Z6COC9UZcM aVPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750867018; x=1751471818; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TnQ6U2Cyxfs2njJfr+S27AJxd4QZUS+L9XHalJW5Its=; b=PMiFN3INl+vWbY1qEX8p7VUZyJbRdpO0QclRm9HCzzLLdPED3QfmlKAjjrJMLsJ8g6 Xw+z8HsDV/8zHMsPC4rWPvUAjEkqvD/C7j9HKOZ8Jeiw3+Kyqgz13ehKaTHj+n0pi0/I hjDLfCpwFALotG/NEvUWQaqkcD38pxeGx2E/x6AI3qkUcakgyt0zPlMEgJBG76Qvzwne tKeXYGO0CQX0qcNpgn+w/1XeZT0+yvBu4XbHy0zq2ieloKWxyhef0WoG7ucAW7rt97RH Nwwcayu2E+5jd6VG+swC+Idu4HuEE9p7EsN2HlA6885APDouAC7cT2WdpX6xW97YcxbG Tbtg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVFbb1TR0/xnnC0zWlvcmTeClvyOI40FmS2yBcngvV9hk1Jaklrubw2jHCz6YD3QZD3tNPMJGj24SIX@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy89KaAkqzg7TOBE8DpB184A9LAFOJntLRxgZM/kMiswvkoBb4I Mevc6aUOQMwMIW1Wcc0XnjoW1DKVg0QQvY5/P5DT4hIntBMzHBsPQm+RC06fe3NocHw= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuUanaRys3es2QmsoT40s9TRiWZ5tsoo4+HyHIwC8vtcxqaLA0YsyZ5R01fTuj FYwkMxXhXQ3v7jFVBsZt8+U5UOu+awYDwZsspum1TYEDUnGOfjlYrHIC9yx3iHJ+6D21DzrenqA V2tXco6v5pZizQo/xAhJy3cbGHq6UHYFtEuGOg3wGGQ0hJsL8QQx0bMlh0811yoVMUL7IMdqyod SD8/PjrZ6wgDiF1iy7ACWoviPUFmcedddrJvVEIlJmg5Vgi13VASIe64hDGyXg1hSauL26TqeXO Hb1wZfmV/XMVeiWoVPxEWE4NE2uypyLqVlzIMbsJz41e6cmuH/fgCw3sfdNQSw6csZu0L+a7QiG w6AKB8vPzu+22V/SOCqZI8pMbGV8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFnyjaFwClhoLHY4neCfFPtebMRcA0oo0I9v9S/4LgcQYnOgYL+PndxePy8fTJnbd4Y3QC13A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:440d:b0:3a5:8a68:b815 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6f2eb674bmr145165f8f.46.1750867017524; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.35] (188-141-3-146.dynamic.upc.ie. [188.141.3.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6e8051677sm4998091f8f.15.2025.06.25.08.56.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:56:54 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Sort interconnects alphabetically To: Vladimir Zapolskiy , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Robert Foss , Todor Tomov Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dmitry Baryshkov , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20250624094253.57441-1-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org> <20250624094253.57441-2-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org> <5a5b78f7-e156-4c5e-8407-b249040e227d@kernel.org> <329b89a4-85a9-496f-8b1b-6239dfc9057b@kernel.org> <930edec1-7403-4ecf-bb17-2e68b8d351f8@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Bryan O'Donoghue In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 25/06/2025 15:07, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > On 6/25/25 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 25/06/2025 08:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 24/06/2025 15:29, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>> On 6/24/25 15:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 24/06/2025 13:38, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>>>> On 6/24/25 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 24/06/2025 11:42, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>>>>>> Sort the entries of interconnect and interconnect-names lists in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> alphabetical order of values in the latter property. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We do not sort these entries alphabetically and you did not >>>>>>> explain why >>>>>>> you are doing this. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did it, because I assume that the preference is to sort all named >>>>>> values alphanumerically. >>>>> >>>>> Where is such preference documented? >>>> >>>> There is no such preference documented, as I stated it was my >>>> assumption >>>> and it was based on your firm insistance to apply a particular sorting >>>> order for regs, clocks and interrupts properties. Apparently you are >>> >>> Hm? And the rule is by name? I don't think I ever expressed that or >>> insisted on some sorting by name. During previous talks on camss >>> numerous times you ignored the ONLY rule of sorting I was insisting: >>> keep the same as all other devices. That was the one and only rule. >>> >>>> fine with out of the same sort order for 'interconnects' values, the >>>> criteria of picked properties remains unclear for me. >>> >>> I don't understand why it is unclear. That time with Bryan you both >>> received VERY CLEAR feedback from me: there is no such rule of sorting >>> any values. Yet you were pushing the discussion and patchset like there >>> was something. >>> >> Look, the first reply: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/65e5796a-8b8d-44f0-aef4- >> e420083b9d52@kernel.org/ >> >> "You are supposed to keep the same order, as much as >> possible." >> >> What rule is unclear here? > > At the moment of the given comment "the same order" was not "sorting by > values", it was "sorting to address". > > Check the next message right in the same thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/c1539cce-92eb-43fc-9267- > f6e002611bbb@linaro.org/ > > "We always sort by address". And that was the correct statement at > the time of the discussion. > > Did it help to "keep the same order" in any sense? No, the message was > plainly ignored, and after the long discussion with you the sorting order > has been brutally enforced to become the new "sorting by values" order, > and to my sincere today's surprise there is no such rule. Apparently now > I have to believe it was Bryan's and my voluntary and deliberate decision > to change the sorting order, all right. > >> Even more precise reply from me: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/8f11c99b-f3ca-4501- >> aec4-0795643fc3a9@kernel.org/ >> >> "I don't imply sorting by name is any better." >> >> And: >> >> "The only rule is that all >> devices from same family type must have the same order." >> >> >> And now you claim there was from me "firm insistance to apply a >> particular sorting" in context of name? >> >> So again, my entire feedback repeated multiple times during that >> discussion is totally ignored and twisted to some fake new rule of name >> sorting. >> > > Thank you for the explanation, and not just your messages are ignored > sometimes, it happens with anybody regularly. > > -- > Best wishes, > Vladimir Lets put a cap on this discussion. The direction is to follow what's already upstream. --- bod