From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2703DCCA47C for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232981AbiGLKKe (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:10:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232940AbiGLKKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:10:10 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6401ACEE3 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id u13so13116961lfn.5 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:09:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uZ6PBg0k+LNPWSahV/wsPmCFTFziNXNqJA+X92tR5lQ=; b=UZrkexqe1KGcx9tnd0D+7tFUi+wtQiLe/TNBgXWXfjPGLfg4I7N9pJ/RGRzi116K6v UKQ0tcnDgaKSykVeXiPij9NY4YpLftWsujncRv+jB8/9IkGvMQX8jL2CDb5eWC4gR4ub +o/RnygqEVN+B8RhvTEDTe8XHx/oZzaPrA3vxPoCeC1SL82egNRsbAewlsVKMwCjE5bQ CAAeA97lPuaI9Oq/G8nacQ6DtFIgEKQJICeBHR/lymHt2CXiI7UrX5M/5ReEZliZASrX 7924c5RalRb3ZHBnkJCp+1HVK616mUo/ceMPsA4p/69OpuhFM5W1ddfjUt5H3p7fcBkb q1jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uZ6PBg0k+LNPWSahV/wsPmCFTFziNXNqJA+X92tR5lQ=; b=dDhnLtj114hswQwb1IjsB5NMuKi3GKNcAothnnpE/5LT1tRZyVbksx+X9QWWT3DVOR NkL8u7k3ts64VTTInc3ijfP0gz6TNzTVdLCOPI/Vg3ShYNCJkhHpzmdiWKkc3HnHiIN7 T5B0gLaswZmJ4SvveDrvhjppGWhnRLpMgYjdLRVQMVgVeoOUvpbwqEapOvQvRzyyPNCv 2DCTMsd9VvklRsvz65w9aWHQnKZd6wPcmLSH/7o57dDOoU7Cu9mcyxfsalGMQTQTYBAr r8HOfDVgRbEpynFpGh5cZnPSOLp4qqOuNB2g7IFxNfLs//dShuNq/NLxjKpfGm1R0mWw SSqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/nepEdfQ8pyYESE/Jvv8bLXZ2nSlhtXkGQJK3blvjQUSFRWthX yCd/oShJUrEr5nkYGPv1VCfxhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1spzIn1kXom2zh22zmT5Aqy5fffNoevGip0xPBZELGAE86f4I3+XEfcAKDHmEN9HsrJ303VvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3c86:b0:489:cef9:18bd with SMTP id h6-20020a0565123c8600b00489cef918bdmr9827225lfv.386.1657620583031; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.8] (fwa5da9-171.bb.online.no. [88.93.169.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4-20020a056512358400b00489cfd58ef6sm1885307lfr.88.2022.07.12.03.09.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:09:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] pwm: dwc: add snps,pwm-number to limit pwm count Content-Language: en-US To: Ben Dooks , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Thierry Reding , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Greentime Hu , Jude Onyenegecha , Sudip Mukherjee , William Salmon , Adnan Chowdhury References: <20220712100113.569042-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com> <20220712100113.569042-8-ben.dooks@sifive.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20220712100113.569042-8-ben.dooks@sifive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/2022 12:01, Ben Dooks wrote: > Add snps,pwm-number property to indicate if the block does not have > all 8 of the PWM blocks. > > Not sure if this should be a general PWM property consider optional > for all PWM types, so have added a specific one here (there is only > one other controller with a property for PWM count at the moment) > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-synposys.yaml | 5 +++++ No. Please do not hide bindings patches in the code. They must be separate and checkpatch complains about it, so please be sure you run checkpatch. Best regards, Krzysztof