From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eraretuya@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 06:02:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a675f3f1-23cf-4b7c-ac93-437f57e9b48b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFXKEHYMiARxrN7=jqnJtEVREseZ-zmZmVeY1uNXZV6viwHbmw@mail.gmail.com>
On 26/03/2024 21:17, Lothar Rubusch wrote:
>>>
>>> V1: The first version of the 3wire patch. I have split the single
>>> patch upon some feedback (yours?!) - V2... So, my current
>>> interpretation is, that every feedback I need to mention as
>>> Reviewed-by tag, no?
>>
>> What? Feedback is not review. It's clearly explained in submitting
>> patches. Please read it.
>>
>
> Exactly. My missunderstanding here is this: Why did you send me a
> reminder that I forgot to add "Reviewed-by" tag in your last mail?
> Could you please clarify your last mail? You wrote:
> "(...)
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions, (...)"
>
> AFAIK noone literally had told me: "please add a Reviewed-by me tag",
> or did I miss something? I'm a bit lost here, sorry.
>
What was this then:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/9700cc88-bddb-480d-9417-04b2ff539a2f@linaro.org/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 15:33 [PATCH v4 0/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire feature Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Make data_range obsolete Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 20:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-26 20:59 ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-28 13:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Group bus configuration Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 20:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Move defines to header Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 18:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-25 21:05 ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 21:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-25 22:09 ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-26 6:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-26 20:17 ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 5:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Pass function pointer to core Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 20:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add comment to probe Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire option Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-25 20:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a675f3f1-23cf-4b7c-ac93-437f57e9b48b@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eraretuya@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=l.rubusch@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).