From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9845FC00140 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233807AbiGZP7X (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:59:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232819AbiGZP7X (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:59:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A1782C12F; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id y24so13715223plh.7; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=57o1v3WV4ubipwS3abJpah9hJJPNNRgMDiHh3namw3I=; b=WcVN2HanxONRGtLe8KqmdrJozSjLhVzY+wmRxSjqz1fQWrfLaSUfT1Oic9Fz/sJAWD 8K4kHje+I2el/DpNX1yqJH0zDrf2aqvCsArGN5jMyadNrU1nEYvJb3kcINX4Afll2IMi 53yIun0jyE9Lqvp0+O6P8vxzMSkCcRIlc8bzFrZoeQV+3qJbcqv9xOxRsi8ByCe9EGSs 3Z4HOkjU2TJduL2tSpxiFFLku1qLy8Zm9PERgLpCaxkFS//p/dHtR/UP6EOPEmWJUAtV 38zTl4meS1Woeqrd8NxGvHP96rQVfjR+KFKnmJ2kiNFB/l6q2QTHooj1EVAbzqrg66CH LK8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=57o1v3WV4ubipwS3abJpah9hJJPNNRgMDiHh3namw3I=; b=OHKkh7nkp2sGqCgZRwJXhEuzipcJIoaJMez3PkX6w2F2/M7aO1yJTTwhcz1wn+a4Cq g9FHn+DZJVtk+6UL0CygrzqPA2ICjLmlyH3oq4LDK3vLkfj5RqUO1PwXioGWnF8jI/wr 5Or1unTWjm1Cout9wB/lgQBBF59GmRjoYlvjEkKT6JfkmqLaLBaqwv9vcl4fnHxBeZxj RzIIYW4KIXTUhpGUN31xCwEAmhzwVTWQgAmd/4Nj1rccHIg9z7LZgX5tSGfZAZyo2psK q8p7XUb9zBxoyKS9qlveNTz4Z1AyhFbuY5JTiraeBZ78G8ReFFISS+9xU3b22efoyTDK g8qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9BNpBBCfZgYYD+EOdDZ7oG2GSuWzdkQB3dHVwGZJarT8fa2EYB vfof7gQy4GRP6EVNYE03ECs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tbdXRJNvLagf6KQtq7gWhtRWdov/3CcSwRZ96bA4SvoNXcT+j2yMwVGZ8DxvVKa0R7hq9NQA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cf09:b0:16d:69ad:e496 with SMTP id i9-20020a170902cf0900b0016d69ade496mr12248813plg.6.1658851161643; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i29-20020aa796fd000000b0052b94e74e45sm11792118pfq.204.2022.07.26.08.59.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:59:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: bcm: use absolute path to other schema Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Saenz Julienne , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220726115841.101249-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20220726115841.101249-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20220726115841.101249-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 7/26/22 04:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Absolute path to other DT schema is preferred over relative one. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Acked-by: Florian Fainelli Are you applying those patches or do you want the SoC maintainer to do that? -- Florian