From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B15FC43334 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 19:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230285AbiGFTze (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:55:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232950AbiGFTzc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:55:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD5417E24 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id i17so14986857ljj.12 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=mxx0NhRQGF1roPP4zUR+jS909if3vve2lCYvqaCEj0o8N8iN2WWvFZrCj72oW4VAJl 4A4EHkuGXvb/iMt+FKYOYSXXnkfZB7wk/vxowFPjLKoFPuJkBcoqSykKDWFYoC6gtITD +lMVqMSTotP+JkO8YToXGVnCZEcFtpp0R0HeHuy8ZLpnv3m/QlxJ9/CSQhJ+19e5gptB nUU6Al/QL71JK8UOiq5xICi46Qv/8rYBqAHS7HWJc3qqeGhjpu7qdMJROatRzOxrZYyr MoebsfkQ8tAE90yRHltpvsxyIYZ+TK7Gkv9Dv8Mkmf6H2nllsdO/KwBY9AYisOcj4KMW xJyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=3F55NIu2SIvE5tRVuVXrcweVRpNnA3rxcTLG8ki+h7xjIqNZLFSnhIzBLyi6IQxOSx HXWpbBLZ2dZzQOTEnnLUyEI7gosS/pG8vV4hyC75yZeP1e7JEFdLC/ibZLBJrNuJK3H/ Ra1g5bVgjtqbKU8rvM8faaK1s7t7qWQ1xVXUnn94apxIKkJV+TGazxtDdvHGBBsLkIN4 4y9lwA6mYPevph7cwg6Jpb9+iL67Ib5muk7otGDbKUcToTo2MvL8zRt/0sOcQlp2WWwI w3S5YGw88HCCkWrLaHEQ1QZhyxHQUT33Q6RGUkHFoXTQUXfgyfLZbfjsDmWVFkj15HsG cg2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+jZzNuMx6FGOthLITn7JWyrYJt5UXZkiuOB2lm5Q5eh96eF7ph 4QVUKPD2U//hz8RuEgl0pZ0k/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vnBn9IH/IF7sLcDzjlPr71ImIMk5XqA2RucdlxyWgmXqAt0KV2/I5NtaX1BUqu46ajylefPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2317:b0:25b:fc32:906a with SMTP id bi23-20020a05651c231700b0025bfc32906amr19597103ljb.445.1657137329221; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.52] ([84.20.121.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11-20020a056512234b00b0047f6b4a53cdsm6413232lfu.172.2022.07.06.12.55.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:55:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Wolfram Sang , Sebastian Reichel , Heiko Stuebner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20220623163136.246404-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> <2664d6a7-ee4b-9cfa-800e-e97522e3986c@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > What do you mean by that? The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) Best regards, Krzysztof