From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA9C1FF610; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744917749; cv=none; b=UTfF8cUhjCe5r9n6yeh+VgQk7xn6RgEYRGLfqtAdIedew0Y8yneSnzvGV9O+CLNCzT0XSWBAnFqJAQL2ZtP/dF3/QeJ6X2+Q0x5SVkocNzyP5KpkDTQn2ks+9Yp1XHfkadiZyVs0VU5YYeSgNt/9WVR8CjmU9llsKY/6PKuLcLQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744917749; c=relaxed/simple; bh=erzSqX42u86Pu0QutiQ6JSyJ1eLwKyc4t7HHtCGZOG8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qrQuX6eBQp85KWsGp0WyGw6T+eZ2CfLOV5fxD90r5aL1tnQW2q0ruC2I0K8K9faoe7LzEN6gs1fPN2sxgrRQ0Oh9ZftHcsRnwFFInCzMhKkoZFw+yVevnIk9JGKxBN1zxFaZuB49/Y8XKUm0Dt4BWWT7/KFphn/VJktA75NDqnc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=OIAJMk6k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="OIAJMk6k" Received: from gaggiata.pivistrello.it (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1D3801F92A; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:22:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1744917745; bh=erzSqX42u86Pu0QutiQ6JSyJ1eLwKyc4t7HHtCGZOG8=; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=OIAJMk6k3f7HE3QqoyRCE33tRQylqAzRmLQJ1xkRGMyigwieSNZLLl7YVWqxUGCaJ 6hBW7bgpqfoTpVL5q19dRyMa1+vdJ9C9uYy+Oe/5pWk8aepzDtiUJz3D/gCO2gHhoH HqDFIqeBghsOBFyGeeoPyuhllPrBNGjo6+KJNFbSXsJdF8ZgITqDq1aqCRh2uCHMRJ ucfBC4Fnh3Ugle18oNie1N83NG65kkUkz1laHGXGsYCxkw4jRq86jA8XZlC9O2j8By jqZwHLMx6jrWTxLQwXUINwXnWpwDtTX0rYsBAvOiM1D6lZK2NR5GnfS9Dlgu6qkbDm 5KhZAyNZt72bg== Received: by gaggiata.pivistrello.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0D4B7FD18; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:22:24 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Judith Mendez Cc: Ulf Hansson , Adrian Hunter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josua Mayer , Moteen Shah , Francesco Dolcini , Hiago De Franco Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA Message-ID: References: <20250417182652.3521104-1-jm@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250417182652.3521104-1-jm@ti.com> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:26:50PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: > There are eMMC boot failures seen with V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA on Kingston > eMMC and variouse types of SD cards on Sitara K3 SoCs due to the > sequencing when enumerating to HS200 mode. Since V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA is > optional for eMMC, do not set V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA by default for eMMC. > For SD cards we shall parse DT for ti,suppress-v1p8-ena property > to determine whether to apply the quirk. I assume this ti,suppress-v1p8-ena should be added to some SoC dtsi, am I wrong? Francesco